PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETEC vs. IBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETEC vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Breakthrough Environmental Solutions ETF (ETEC) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETEC achieves a 27.60% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -27.45% return.


ETEC

1D
-1.09%
1M
7.70%
YTD
27.60%
6M
26.85%
1Y
61.23%
3Y*
10.39%
5Y*
10Y*

IBIT

1D
-2.65%
1M
-22.17%
YTD
-27.45%
6M
-31.40%
1Y
-39.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETEC vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ETEC
iShares Breakthrough Environmental Solutions ETF
27.60%31.89%-11.34%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
-27.45%-6.41%99.21%

Correlation

The correlation between ETEC and IBIT is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETEC vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETEC
ETEC Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ETEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETEC Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
ETEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETEC Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIT
IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETEC vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Breakthrough Environmental Solutions ETF (ETEC) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ETECIBITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

0.86

+0.61

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.87

-0.80

+6.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.36

-1.39

+19.75

ETEC vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETEC Sharpe Ratio is 2.88, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETEC and IBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETECIBITDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.88

-0.91

+3.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.27

+0.08

Drawdowns

ETEC vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETEC drawdown since its inception was -39.71%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -49.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETEC and IBIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETECIBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.71%

-49.47%

+9.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.49%

-49.47%

+38.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.09%

-49.47%

+48.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.98%

-16.07%

+1.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

28.61%

-25.27%

Volatility

ETEC vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Breakthrough Environmental Solutions ETF (ETEC) is 7.21%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 9.14%. This indicates that ETEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETECIBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.21%

9.14%

-1.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.88%

33.89%

-18.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.38%

43.76%

-22.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.86%

50.18%

-26.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.86%

50.18%

-26.32%

ETEC vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETEC has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETEC vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

ETEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
ETEC
iShares Breakthrough Environmental Solutions ETF
0.26%0.33%1.24%4.18%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ETEC and IBIT have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBIT has higher volatility (9.14%) compared to ETEC (7.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETEC dropped -39.71% vs IBIT's -49.47%.

On 1-year performance, ETEC leads with 61.23% vs -39.60% for IBIT. On fees, IBIT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, ETEC has been the lower-risk option at 7.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ETEC has performed better with a 61.23% return vs -39.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for ETEC.

ETEC has the higher dividend yield at 0.26%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.

ETEC is categorized as Technology Equities, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. ETEC tracks Morningstar Global Emerging Green Technologies Select Index - Benchmark TR Net, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for ETEC and 0.25% for IBIT.

ETEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETEC and IBIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer