PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETDD.DE vs. AMES.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETDD.DE vs. AMES.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (ETDD.DE) and Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (AMES.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETDD.DE achieves a 10.28% return, which is significantly lower than AMES.DE's 14.53% return. Over the past 10 years, ETDD.DE has underperformed AMES.DE with an annualized return of 11.87%, while AMES.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 13.44% annualized return.


ETDD.DE

1D
0.83%
1M
3.41%
YTD
10.28%
6M
11.17%
1Y
22.40%
3Y*
16.67%
5Y*
11.98%
10Y*
11.87%

AMES.DE

1D
0.72%
1M
7.06%
YTD
14.53%
6M
15.44%
1Y
46.37%
3Y*
32.90%
5Y*
20.69%
10Y*
13.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETDD.DE vs. AMES.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ETDD.DE
BNP Paribas Easy EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF
10.28%22.09%10.79%22.54%-8.67%23.65%-3.01%29.92%-12.20%9.87%
AMES.DE
Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR
14.53%55.41%19.00%26.86%-0.71%6.98%-12.87%15.76%-12.77%11.84%

Correlation

The correlation between ETDD.DE and AMES.DE is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2015

0.81

The correlation between ETDD.DE and AMES.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETDD.DE vs. AMES.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETDD.DE
ETDD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
ETDD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETDD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETDD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
ETDD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETDD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

AMES.DE
AMES.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
AMES.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMES.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMES.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
AMES.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMES.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETDD.DE vs. AMES.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (ETDD.DE) and Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (AMES.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ETDD.DEAMES.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.50

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

4.64

-2.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.06

16.40

-9.33

ETDD.DE vs. AMES.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETDD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the AMES.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETDD.DE and AMES.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ETDD.DE vs. AMES.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETDD.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.41%, smaller than the maximum AMES.DE drawdown of -40.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETDD.DE and AMES.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETDD.DEAMES.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.41%

-40.98%

+2.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.99%

-9.95%

-1.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.51%

-12.58%

-3.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.24%

-17.77%

-5.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.41%

-40.98%

+2.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

-0.10%

-0.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.58%

-10.09%

+3.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

2.82%

+0.34%

Volatility

ETDD.DE vs. AMES.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNP Paribas Easy EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (ETDD.DE) is 3.61%, while Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (AMES.DE) has a volatility of 4.04%. This indicates that ETDD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMES.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETDD.DEAMES.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.61%

4.04%

-0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.24%

13.99%

-0.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.98%

16.47%

-0.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.59%

16.97%

+0.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.03%

18.42%

-0.39%

ETDD.DE vs. AMES.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETDD.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than AMES.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ETDD.DE vs. AMES.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ETDD.DE nor AMES.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ETDD.DE and AMES.DE have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ETDD.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ETDD.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AMES.DE.

ETDD.DE tracks EURO STOXX® 50, while AMES.DE tracks MSCI Spain. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for ETDD.DE and 0.25% for AMES.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETDD.DE and AMES.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer