ETC.TO vs. SOLL.TO
ETC.TO (Evolve Cryptocurrencies ETF) and SOLL.TO (Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ETC.TO returned -38.74% vs -56.21% for SOLL.TO. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ETC.TO charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for SOLL.TO.
Performance
ETC.TO vs. SOLL.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETC.TO achieves a -27.84% return, which is significantly higher than SOLL.TO's -42.41% return.
ETC.TO
- 1D
- -2.53%
- 1M
- -17.24%
- YTD
- -27.84%
- 6M
- -33.98%
- 1Y
- -38.74%
- 3Y*
- 24.15%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOLL.TO
- 1D
- -4.68%
- 1M
- -14.73%
- YTD
- -42.41%
- 6M
- -50.32%
- 1Y
- -56.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETC.TO vs. SOLL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ETC.TO Evolve Cryptocurrencies ETF | -27.84% | 8.72% |
SOLL.TO Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units | -42.41% | -7.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETC.TO and SOLL.TO is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2025 | 0.87 |
The correlation between ETC.TO and SOLL.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETC.TO vs. SOLL.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ETC.TO
SOLL.TO
ETC.TO vs. SOLL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve Cryptocurrencies ETF (ETC.TO) and Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units (SOLL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETC.TO | SOLL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.82 | -0.78 | -0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.11 | -1.09 | -0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 0.88 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.73 | -0.79 | +0.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.23 | -1.24 | +0.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETC.TO | SOLL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.82 | -0.78 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | -0.61 | +0.69 |
Drawdowns
ETC.TO vs. SOLL.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETC.TO drawdown since its inception was -75.66%, which is greater than SOLL.TO's maximum drawdown of -71.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETC.TO and SOLL.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETC.TO | SOLL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.66% | -71.52% | -4.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.00% | -71.52% | +18.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.46% | -71.52% | +19.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.35% | -34.60% | -0.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.46% | 45.19% | -13.73% |
Volatility
ETC.TO vs. SOLL.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Evolve Cryptocurrencies ETF (ETC.TO) is 9.86%, while Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units (SOLL.TO) has a volatility of 16.48%. This indicates that ETC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOLL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETC.TO | SOLL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.86% | 16.48% | -6.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.18% | 50.24% | -14.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.23% | 72.62% | -25.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.17% | 71.16% | -16.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.17% | 71.16% | -16.99% |
ETC.TO vs. SOLL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETC.TO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than SOLL.TO's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETC.TO vs. SOLL.TO - Dividend Comparison
ETC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, while SOLL.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ETC.TO Evolve Cryptocurrencies ETF | 0.81% | 0.58% | 0.05% |
SOLL.TO Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETC.TO and SOLL.TO have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ETC.TO is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ETC.TO is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for SOLL.TO.
They also come from different issuers: Evolve and Purpose Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ETC.TO and 1.00% for SOLL.TO.
Find the right allocation for ETC.TO and SOLL.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer