ETC.TO vs. FBTC.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Evolve Cryptocurrencies ETF (ETC.TO) and Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO).

ETC.TO and FBTC.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ETC.TO is an actively managed fund by Evolve. It was launched on Aug 21, 2024. FBTC.TO is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 30, 2021.

Performance

ETC.TO vs. FBTC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Evolve Cryptocurrencies ETF (ETC.TO) and Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ETC.TO vs. FBTC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ETC.TO Evolve Cryptocurrencies ETF	-23.10%	-13.66%	117.58%	126.17%	-63.55%	-20.81%
FBTC.TO Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF	-21.62%	-10.85%	137.16%	145.80%	-61.34%	-20.88%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETC.TO achieves a -23.10% return, which is significantly lower than FBTC.TO's -21.62% return.

ETC.TO

• 1D: 2.26%
• 1M: 5.54%
• YTD: -23.10%
• 6M: -43.95%
• 1Y: -19.35%
• 3Y*: 25.53%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FBTC.TO

• 1D: 1.70%
• 1M: 5.18%
• YTD: -21.62%
• 6M: -40.83%
• 1Y: -20.77%
• 3Y*: 33.25%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETC.TO vs. FBTC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETC.TO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FBTC.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.

ETC.TO

Evolve Cryptocurrencies ETF

FBTC.TO

Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF

Return for Risk

ETC.TO vs. FBTC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETC.TO

ETC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6
ETC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
ETC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
ETC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6
ETC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
ETC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6

FBTC.TO

FBTC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5
FBTC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
FBTC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
FBTC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5
FBTC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
FBTC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETC.TO vs. FBTC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve Cryptocurrencies ETF (ETC.TO) and Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ETC.TO	FBTC.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.40	-0.47	+0.07
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.28	-0.41	+0.13
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	0.95	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.38	-0.43	+0.05
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.79	-0.91	+0.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ETC.TO vs. FBTC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETC.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is comparable to the FBTC.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETC.TO and FBTC.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ETC.TO	FBTC.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.40	-0.47	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.12	0.10	+0.02

Correlation

The correlation between ETC.TO and FBTC.TO is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

ETC.TO vs. FBTC.TO - Dividend Comparison

ETC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, while FBTC.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024
ETC.TO Evolve Cryptocurrencies ETF	0.76%	0.58%	0.05%
FBTC.TO Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

ETC.TO vs. FBTC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETC.TO drawdown since its inception was -75.66%, which is greater than FBTC.TO's maximum drawdown of -70.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETC.TO and FBTC.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETC.TO	FBTC.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.66%	-70.77%	-4.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-53.00%	-50.22%	-2.78%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-49.34%	-46.48%	-2.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.98%	-30.53%	-4.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.28%	23.72%	+1.56%

Volatility

ETC.TO vs. FBTC.TO - Volatility Comparison

Evolve Cryptocurrencies ETF (ETC.TO) has a higher volatility of 14.56% compared to Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO) at 13.01%. This indicates that ETC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBTC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ETC.TO	FBTC.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.56%	13.01%	+1.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.98%	36.24%	+3.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	48.96%	44.80%	+4.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	54.80%	52.99%	+1.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	54.80%	52.99%	+1.81%