PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESUS.L vs. EQQU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESUS.L vs. EQQU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI USA ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Dist (ESUS.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ESUS.L is traded in GBp, while EQQU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EQQU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESUS.L achieves a 11.78% return, which is significantly lower than EQQU.L's 20.83% return.


ESUS.L

1D
-0.39%
1M
6.07%
YTD
11.78%
6M
11.13%
1Y
28.60%
3Y*
19.05%
5Y*
10Y*

EQQU.L

1D
0.00%
1M
10.21%
YTD
20.83%
6M
19.00%
1Y
42.53%
3Y*
25.05%
5Y*
19.02%
10Y*
22.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESUS.L vs. EQQU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ESUS.L
Invesco MSCI USA ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Dist
11.78%7.49%26.65%21.14%-12.50%10.31%
EQQU.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
20.03%11.22%28.75%48.45%-25.54%11.32%

Correlation

The correlation between ESUS.L and EQQU.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2021

0.87

The correlation between ESUS.L and EQQU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESUS.L vs. EQQU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESUS.L
ESUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
ESUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
ESUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

EQQU.L
EQQU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
EQQU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQQU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQQU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
EQQU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQQU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESUS.L vs. EQQU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI USA ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Dist (ESUS.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESUS.LEQQU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.47

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.51

3.81

-0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.38

10.77

+1.61

ESUS.L vs. EQQU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESUS.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is comparable to the EQQU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESUS.L and EQQU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESUS.LEQQU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.64

2.68

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.99

-0.14

Drawdowns

ESUS.L vs. EQQU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESUS.L drawdown since its inception was -21.43%, smaller than the maximum EQQU.L drawdown of -27.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESUS.L and EQQU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESUS.LEQQU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.43%

-27.75%

+6.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.11%

-11.12%

+3.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.43%

-24.26%

+2.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

0.00%

-0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.92%

-5.38%

+0.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

3.94%

-1.64%

Volatility

ESUS.L vs. EQQU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco MSCI USA ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Dist (ESUS.L) is 2.84%, while Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQU.L) has a volatility of 4.88%. This indicates that ESUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQQU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESUS.LEQQU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.84%

4.88%

-2.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.60%

11.61%

-4.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.80%

15.81%

-5.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.87%

20.03%

-5.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.87%

20.15%

-5.28%

ESUS.L vs. EQQU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESUS.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than EQQU.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESUS.L vs. EQQU.L - Dividend Comparison

ESUS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, more than EQQU.L's 0.23% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
EQQU.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
0.23%0.29%0.38%0.39%0.56%0.26%0.11%
ESUS.L
Invesco MSCI USA ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Dist
0.83%0.90%0.96%1.19%1.36%0.33%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESUS.L and EQQU.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ESUS.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESUS.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EQQU.L.

ESUS.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while EQQU.L is Nasdaq-100. ESUS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while EQQU.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ESUS.L and 0.30% for EQQU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESUS.L and EQQU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer