ESUM vs. SCHK
ESUM (Eventide US Market ETF) and SCHK (Schwab 1000 Index ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. ESUM is actively managed, while SCHK is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ESUM charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHK.
Performance
ESUM vs. SCHK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESUM achieves a 11.96% return, which is significantly higher than SCHK's 10.46% return.
ESUM
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- 3.76%
- YTD
- 11.96%
- 6M
- 11.72%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHK
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 1.23%
- YTD
- 10.46%
- 6M
- 10.53%
- 1Y
- 27.01%
- 3Y*
- 20.84%
- 5Y*
- 13.28%
- 10Y*
- —
ESUM vs. SCHK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ESUM Eventide US Market ETF | 11.96% | 0.82% |
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF | 10.46% | 5.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESUM and SCHK is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2025 | 0.88 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESUM vs. SCHK — Risk / Return Rank
ESUM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SCHK
ESUM vs. SCHK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eventide US Market ETF (ESUM) and Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESUM | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.38 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.00 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.44 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESUM vs. SCHK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESUM drawdown since its inception was -8.13%, smaller than the maximum SCHK drawdown of -34.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESUM and SCHK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESUM | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.13% | -34.80% | +26.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.86% | -1.26% | +0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.62% | -5.16% | +3.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.00% | — |
Volatility
ESUM vs. SCHK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESUM | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.84% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.07% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.30% | 12.74% | +1.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.30% | 17.33% | -3.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.30% | 19.12% | -4.82% |
ESUM vs. SCHK - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESUM has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHK's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESUM vs. SCHK - Dividend Comparison
ESUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than SCHK's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESUM Eventide US Market ETF | 0.57% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF | 1.01% | 1.09% | 1.20% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.17% | 1.58% | 1.82% | 1.80% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESUM and SCHK have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCHK is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHK is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ESUM.
SCHK has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.57% for ESUM.
They also come from different issuers: Eventide and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ESUM and 0.03% for SCHK.
Find the right allocation for ESUM and SCHK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer