ESPS.L vs. SADA.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ESPS.L (Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc) and SADA.L (Amundi Index MSCI EM Asia SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (D)) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - ESPS.L tracks the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD while SADA.L tracks the MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ESPS.L returned 9.70%/yr vs 12.35%/yr for SADA.L. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ESPS.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for SADA.L.

Performance

ESPS.L vs. SADA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESPS.L) and Amundi Index MSCI EM Asia SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (D) (SADA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

ESPS.L is traded in GBp, while SADA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SADA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESPS.L achieves a 7.41% return, which is significantly lower than SADA.L's 19.91% return.

ESPS.L

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 0.59%
• YTD: 7.41%
• 6M: 8.29%
• 1Y: 16.01%
• 3Y*: 9.70%
• 5Y*: 6.22%
• 10Y*: —

SADA.L

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: 7.21%
• YTD: 19.91%
• 6M: 20.52%
• 1Y: 44.14%
• 3Y*: 12.35%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESPS.L vs. SADA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ESPS.L Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc	7.41%	10.52%	7.35%	2.26%	1.34%	-0.11%
SADA.L Amundi Index MSCI EM Asia SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (D)	19.91%	17.12%	9.61%	-9.03%	-13.90%	-5.51%

Correlation

The correlation between ESPS.L and SADA.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2021	0.25

The correlation between ESPS.L and SADA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.40 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ESPS.L vs. SADA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ESPS.L	SADA.L
Financial Services	50.7%	12.7%
Basic Materials	11.6%	3.5%
Real Estate	7.8%	2.7%
Industrials	7.2%	8.7%
Consumer Cyclical	6.8%	9.5%
Healthcare	4.0%	6.8%
Energy	3.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	2.6%	5.0%
Communication Services	2.6%	5.1%
Utilities	2.2%	1.6%
Technology	1.4%	44.3%

Return for Risk

ESPS.L vs. SADA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESPS.L

ESPS.L Risk / Return Rank: 42
ESPS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
ESPS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
ESPS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 42
ESPS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
ESPS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 39

SADA.L

SADA.L Risk / Return Rank: 86
SADA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
SADA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
SADA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 84
SADA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
SADA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESPS.L vs. SADA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESPS.L) and Amundi Index MSCI EM Asia SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (D) (SADA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ESPS.L	SADA.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.47	3.23	-1.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	4.36	-2.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.55	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.12	6.34	-4.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.09	16.77	-10.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ESPS.L vs. SADA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESPS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the SADA.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESPS.L and SADA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ESPS.L	SADA.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.47	3.23	-1.75
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	0.21	+0.47

Drawdowns

ESPS.L vs. SADA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESPS.L drawdown since its inception was -17.76%, smaller than the maximum SADA.L drawdown of -32.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESPS.L and SADA.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	ESPS.L	SADA.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.76%	-32.41%	+14.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.52%	-10.26%	+2.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.76%	-21.06%	+3.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.76%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.28%	-0.73%	-2.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.55%	-15.18%	+10.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.62%	6.29%	-3.67%

Volatility

ESPS.L vs. SADA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESPS.L) is 3.47%, while Amundi Index MSCI EM Asia SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (D) (SADA.L) has a volatility of 6.80%. This indicates that ESPS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SADA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ESPS.L	SADA.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.47%	6.80%	-3.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.32%	13.95%	-5.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.81%	20.19%	-9.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.87%	23.30%	-4.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.87%	23.30%	-4.43%

ESPS.L vs. SADA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESPS.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than SADA.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ESPS.L vs. SADA.L - Dividend Comparison

ESPS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SADA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ESPS.L Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SADA.L Amundi Index MSCI EM Asia SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (D)	1.32%	1.58%	1.54%	1.63%	1.66%	0.51%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ESPS.L and SADA.L in my portfolio?

ESPS.L and SADA.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ESPS.L or SADA.L?

On fees, ESPS.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ESPS.L or SADA.L?

ESPS.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for SADA.L.

What is the main difference between ESPS.L and SADA.L?

ESPS.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD, while SADA.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ESPS.L and 0.25% for SADA.L.