PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESPS.L vs. PAXJ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESPS.L vs. PAXJ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESPS.L) and Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF (PAXJ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ESPS.L is traded in GBp, while PAXJ.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PAXJ.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESPS.L achieves a 7.41% return, which is significantly lower than PAXJ.L's 10.05% return.


ESPS.L

1D
-0.43%
1M
0.59%
YTD
7.41%
6M
8.29%
1Y
16.01%
3Y*
9.70%
5Y*
6.22%
10Y*

PAXJ.L

1D
-0.53%
1M
0.94%
YTD
10.05%
6M
11.25%
1Y
20.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESPS.L vs. PAXJ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ESPS.L and PAXJ.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024

0.43

The correlation between ESPS.L and PAXJ.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (all time) to 0.61 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ESPS.L vs. PAXJ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ESPS.L
PAXJ.L

Financial Services

50.7%
46.1%

Basic Materials

11.6%
14.6%

Real Estate

7.8%
7.8%

Industrials

7.2%
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

6.8%
6.0%

Healthcare

4.0%
3.7%

Energy

3.0%
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

2.6%
3.0%

Communication Services

2.6%
2.7%

Utilities

2.2%
3.6%

Technology

1.4%
1.1%

Financial Services

ESPS.L
50.7%
PAXJ.L
46.1%

Basic Materials

ESPS.L
11.6%
PAXJ.L
14.6%

Real Estate

ESPS.L
7.8%
PAXJ.L
7.8%

Industrials

ESPS.L
7.2%
PAXJ.L
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

ESPS.L
6.8%
PAXJ.L
6.0%

Healthcare

ESPS.L
4.0%
PAXJ.L
3.7%

Energy

ESPS.L
3.0%
PAXJ.L
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

ESPS.L
2.6%
PAXJ.L
3.0%

Communication Services

ESPS.L
2.6%
PAXJ.L
2.7%

Utilities

ESPS.L
2.2%
PAXJ.L
3.6%

Technology

ESPS.L
1.4%
PAXJ.L
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESPS.L vs. PAXJ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESPS.L
ESPS.L Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
ESPS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESPS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESPS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
ESPS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESPS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

PAXJ.L
PAXJ.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
PAXJ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAXJ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAXJ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
PAXJ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAXJ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESPS.L vs. PAXJ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESPS.L) and Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF (PAXJ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESPS.LPAXJ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.45

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

5.30

-3.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.09

13.64

-7.55

ESPS.L vs. PAXJ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESPS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the PAXJ.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESPS.L and PAXJ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESPS.LPAXJ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.47

2.52

-1.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

1.76

-1.09

Drawdowns

ESPS.L vs. PAXJ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESPS.L drawdown since its inception was -17.76%, roughly equal to the maximum PAXJ.L drawdown of -17.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESPS.L and PAXJ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESPS.LPAXJ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.76%

-17.40%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.52%

-7.11%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.28%

-2.04%

-1.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.55%

-2.59%

-1.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

Volatility

ESPS.L vs. PAXJ.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESPS.L) is 3.47%, while Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF (PAXJ.L) has a volatility of 4.18%. This indicates that ESPS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAXJ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESPS.LPAXJ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.47%

4.18%

-0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.32%

10.05%

-1.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.81%

15.00%

-4.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.87%

24.18%

-5.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.87%

24.18%

-5.31%

ESPS.L vs. PAXJ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESPS.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than PAXJ.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ESPS.L vs. PAXJ.L - Dividend Comparison

ESPS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PAXJ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ESPS.L and PAXJ.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PAXJ.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PAXJ.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for ESPS.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ESPS.L and 0.12% for PAXJ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESPS.L and PAXJ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer