ESPB.L vs. USFM.L
ESPB.L (Invesco MSCI USA ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc) and USFM.L (UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, from Invesco and UBS respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ESPB.L returned 21.75%/yr vs 16.10%/yr for USFM.L. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ESPB.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for USFM.L.
Performance
ESPB.L vs. USFM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ESPB.L having a 11.62% return and USFM.L slightly higher at 11.80%.
ESPB.L
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 5.65%
- YTD
- 11.62%
- 6M
- 12.17%
- 1Y
- 27.57%
- 3Y*
- 21.75%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USFM.L
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 5.37%
- YTD
- 11.80%
- 6M
- 12.26%
- 1Y
- 24.64%
- 3Y*
- 16.10%
- 5Y*
- 11.54%
- 10Y*
- —
ESPB.L vs. USFM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPB.L Invesco MSCI USA ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc | 11.62% | 14.17% | 26.87% | 24.58% | -14.72% |
USFM.L UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 11.80% | 5.73% | 20.11% | 10.47% | 5.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESPB.L and USFM.L is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2022 | 0.55 |
The correlation between ESPB.L and USFM.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (3 years) to 0.66 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ESPB.L vs. USFM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESPB.L
USFM.L
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Technology
ESPB.L
USFM.L
Financial Services
ESPB.L
USFM.L
Consumer Cyclical
ESPB.L
USFM.L
Healthcare
ESPB.L
USFM.L
Communication Services
ESPB.L
USFM.L
Industrials
ESPB.L
USFM.L
Consumer Defensive
ESPB.L
USFM.L
Real Estate
ESPB.L
USFM.L
Basic Materials
ESPB.L
USFM.L
Energy
ESPB.L
USFM.L
Utilities
ESPB.L
USFM.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESPB.L vs. USFM.L — Risk / Return Rank
ESPB.L
USFM.L
ESPB.L vs. USFM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI USA ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc (ESPB.L) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (USFM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESPB.L | USFM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.46 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.95 | 4.48 | -1.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.70 | 15.97 | -3.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESPB.L | USFM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 2.59 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 0.83 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
ESPB.L vs. USFM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESPB.L drawdown since its inception was -24.51%, smaller than the maximum USFM.L drawdown of -27.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESPB.L and USFM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESPB.L | USFM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.51% | -27.52% | +3.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.32% | -5.47% | -3.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.57% | -17.40% | -1.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.25% | 0.00% | -0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.14% | -3.49% | -3.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.17% | 1.54% | +0.63% |
Volatility
ESPB.L vs. USFM.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco MSCI USA ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc (ESPB.L) has a higher volatility of 3.46% compared to UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (USFM.L) at 2.79%. This indicates that ESPB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USFM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESPB.L | USFM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.46% | 2.79% | +0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.07% | 6.78% | +2.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.06% | 9.50% | +2.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.73% | 13.21% | +6.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.73% | 15.33% | +4.40% |
ESPB.L vs. USFM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESPB.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than USFM.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ESPB.L vs. USFM.L - Dividend Comparison
ESPB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while USFM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPB.L Invesco MSCI USA ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USFM.L UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 1.07% | 1.20% | 1.14% | 1.37% | 1.22% | 1.01% | 1.34% | 1.30% | 1.37% | 0.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESPB.L and USFM.L have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ESPB.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESPB.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for USFM.L.
Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for ESPB.L and 0.25% for USFM.L.
Find the right allocation for ESPB.L and USFM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer