ESPB.L vs. FLXU.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ESPB.L (Invesco MSCI USA ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc) and FLXU.L (Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, from Invesco and Franklin Templeton respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ESPB.L returned 21.75%/yr vs 15.98%/yr for FLXU.L. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ESPB.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FLXU.L.

Performance

ESPB.L vs. FLXU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI USA ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc (ESPB.L) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF (FLXU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

ESPB.L is traded in GBp, while FLXU.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the FLXU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESPB.L achieves a 11.62% return, which is significantly lower than FLXU.L's 12.21% return.

ESPB.L

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: 5.65%
• YTD: 11.62%
• 6M: 12.17%
• 1Y: 27.57%
• 3Y*: 21.75%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLXU.L

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 5.68%
• YTD: 12.21%
• 6M: 12.14%
• 1Y: 30.86%
• 3Y*: 15.98%
• 5Y*: 13.30%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESPB.L vs. FLXU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ESPB.L Invesco MSCI USA ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc	11.62%	14.17%	26.87%	24.58%	-14.72%
FLXU.L Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF	12.21%	13.10%	12.49%	8.52%	10.78%

Correlation

The correlation between ESPB.L and FLXU.L is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2022	0.53

Over the past year, ESPB.L and FLXU.L have become more correlated (0.77) than their long-term average of 0.53, meaning their price movements have been converging.

ESPB.L vs. FLXU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ESPB.L	FLXU.L
Technology	36.4%	34.3%
Financial Services	14.0%	9.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	11.5%
Healthcare	9.5%	10.5%
Communication Services	9.0%	12.2%
Industrials	8.7%	10.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.3%	4.4%
Real Estate	2.7%	2.9%
Basic Materials	2.1%	1.7%
Energy	2.0%	1.0%
Utilities	1.3%	1.6%

Return for Risk

ESPB.L vs. FLXU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESPB.L

ESPB.L Risk / Return Rank: 69
ESPB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
ESPB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
ESPB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 71
ESPB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
ESPB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 69

FLXU.L

FLXU.L Risk / Return Rank: 86
FLXU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
FLXU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
FLXU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 83
FLXU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
FLXU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESPB.L vs. FLXU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI USA ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc (ESPB.L) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF (FLXU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ESPB.L	FLXU.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.28	2.73	-0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.35	3.79	-0.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.50	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.95	5.21	-2.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.70	18.94	-6.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ESPB.L vs. FLXU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESPB.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the FLXU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESPB.L and FLXU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ESPB.L	FLXU.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.28	2.73	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.02	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.96	0.89	+0.07

Drawdowns

ESPB.L vs. FLXU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESPB.L drawdown since its inception was -24.51%, roughly equal to the maximum FLXU.L drawdown of -24.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESPB.L and FLXU.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	ESPB.L	FLXU.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.51%	-24.72%	+0.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.32%	-5.90%	-3.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.57%	-20.13%	+1.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.13%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.25%	0.00%	-0.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.14%	-3.01%	-4.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.17%	1.63%	+0.54%

Volatility

ESPB.L vs. FLXU.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco MSCI USA ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc (ESPB.L) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF (FLXU.L) have volatilities of 3.46% and 3.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ESPB.L	FLXU.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.46%	3.46%	0.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.07%	8.19%	+0.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.06%	11.30%	+0.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.73%	13.07%	+6.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.73%	14.93%	+4.80%

ESPB.L vs. FLXU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESPB.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than FLXU.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ESPB.L vs. FLXU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ESPB.L nor FLXU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ESPB.L and FLXU.L in my portfolio?

ESPB.L and FLXU.L have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ESPB.L or FLXU.L?

On fees, ESPB.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ESPB.L or FLXU.L?

ESPB.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FLXU.L.

What is the main difference between ESPB.L and FLXU.L?

Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for ESPB.L and 0.25% for FLXU.L.