PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESPB.L vs. ISDU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESPB.L vs. ISDU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI USA ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc (ESPB.L) and iShares MSCI USA Islamic UCITS ETF (ISDU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ESPB.L is traded in GBp, while ISDU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ISDU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESPB.L achieves a 11.62% return, which is significantly lower than ISDU.L's 24.08% return.


ESPB.L

1D
-0.25%
1M
5.65%
YTD
11.62%
6M
12.17%
1Y
27.57%
3Y*
21.75%
5Y*
10Y*

ISDU.L

1D
1.09%
1M
14.48%
YTD
24.08%
6M
24.22%
1Y
43.22%
3Y*
17.43%
5Y*
15.73%
10Y*
13.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESPB.L vs. ISDU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ESPB.L
Invesco MSCI USA ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc
11.62%14.17%26.87%24.58%-14.72%
ISDU.L
iShares MSCI USA Islamic UCITS ETF
24.08%8.03%11.27%19.55%4.92%

Correlation

The correlation between ESPB.L and ISDU.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2022

0.56

The correlation between ESPB.L and ISDU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (3 years) to 0.70 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ESPB.L vs. ISDU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ESPB.L
ISDU.L

Technology

36.4%
49.7%

Financial Services

14.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
8.8%

Healthcare

9.5%
10.8%

Communication Services

9.0%
0.4%

Industrials

8.7%
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
4.2%

Real Estate

2.7%
0.1%

Basic Materials

2.1%
5.5%

Energy

2.0%
12.3%

Utilities

1.3%
0.7%

Technology

ESPB.L
36.4%
ISDU.L
49.7%

Financial Services

ESPB.L
14.0%
ISDU.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

ESPB.L
10.1%
ISDU.L
8.8%

Healthcare

ESPB.L
9.5%
ISDU.L
10.8%

Communication Services

ESPB.L
9.0%
ISDU.L
0.4%

Industrials

ESPB.L
8.7%
ISDU.L
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

ESPB.L
4.3%
ISDU.L
4.2%

Real Estate

ESPB.L
2.7%
ISDU.L
0.1%

Basic Materials

ESPB.L
2.1%
ISDU.L
5.5%

Energy

ESPB.L
2.0%
ISDU.L
12.3%

Utilities

ESPB.L
1.3%
ISDU.L
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESPB.L vs. ISDU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESPB.L
ESPB.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
ESPB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESPB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESPB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ESPB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESPB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

ISDU.L
ISDU.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
ISDU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISDU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISDU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
ISDU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISDU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESPB.L vs. ISDU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI USA ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc (ESPB.L) and iShares MSCI USA Islamic UCITS ETF (ISDU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESPB.LISDU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.59

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

7.35

-4.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.70

22.91

-10.21

ESPB.L vs. ISDU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESPB.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is lower than the ISDU.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESPB.L and ISDU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESPB.LISDU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

3.30

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

0.80

+0.16

Drawdowns

ESPB.L vs. ISDU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESPB.L drawdown since its inception was -24.51%, roughly equal to the maximum ISDU.L drawdown of -24.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESPB.L and ISDU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESPB.LISDU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.51%

-24.76%

+0.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.32%

-5.85%

-3.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.57%

-24.06%

+5.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

0.00%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.14%

-3.88%

-3.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

1.88%

+0.29%

Volatility

ESPB.L vs. ISDU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco MSCI USA ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc (ESPB.L) is 3.46%, while iShares MSCI USA Islamic UCITS ETF (ISDU.L) has a volatility of 5.10%. This indicates that ESPB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISDU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESPB.LISDU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

5.10%

-1.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.07%

9.92%

-0.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.06%

13.13%

-1.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.73%

15.64%

+4.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.73%

16.42%

+3.31%

ESPB.L vs. ISDU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESPB.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than ISDU.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESPB.L vs. ISDU.L - Dividend Comparison

ESPB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ISDU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESPB.L
Invesco MSCI USA ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ISDU.L
iShares MSCI USA Islamic UCITS ETF
0.61%0.74%0.90%1.10%1.52%1.01%1.39%1.37%1.49%1.38%1.34%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESPB.L and ISDU.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ESPB.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESPB.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ISDU.L.

ESPB.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while ISDU.L tracks MSCI USA Islamic Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for ESPB.L and 0.30% for ISDU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESPB.L and ISDU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer