ESPB.L vs. ISDU.L
ESPB.L (Invesco MSCI USA ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc) and ISDU.L (iShares MSCI USA Islamic UCITS ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - ESPB.L tracks the Russell 1000 TR USD while ISDU.L tracks the MSCI USA Islamic Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ESPB.L returned 21.75%/yr vs 17.43%/yr for ISDU.L. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ESPB.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for ISDU.L.
Performance
ESPB.L vs. ISDU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ESPB.L is traded in GBp, while ISDU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ISDU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESPB.L achieves a 11.62% return, which is significantly lower than ISDU.L's 24.08% return.
ESPB.L
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 5.65%
- YTD
- 11.62%
- 6M
- 12.17%
- 1Y
- 27.57%
- 3Y*
- 21.75%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISDU.L
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 14.48%
- YTD
- 24.08%
- 6M
- 24.22%
- 1Y
- 43.22%
- 3Y*
- 17.43%
- 5Y*
- 15.73%
- 10Y*
- 13.48%
ESPB.L vs. ISDU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPB.L Invesco MSCI USA ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc | 11.62% | 14.17% | 26.87% | 24.58% | -14.72% |
ISDU.L iShares MSCI USA Islamic UCITS ETF | 24.08% | 8.03% | 11.27% | 19.55% | 4.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESPB.L and ISDU.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2022 | 0.56 |
The correlation between ESPB.L and ISDU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (3 years) to 0.70 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ESPB.L vs. ISDU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESPB.L
ISDU.L
Technology
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Technology
ESPB.L
ISDU.L
Financial Services
ESPB.L
ISDU.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
ESPB.L
ISDU.L
Healthcare
ESPB.L
ISDU.L
Communication Services
ESPB.L
ISDU.L
Industrials
ESPB.L
ISDU.L
Consumer Defensive
ESPB.L
ISDU.L
Real Estate
ESPB.L
ISDU.L
Basic Materials
ESPB.L
ISDU.L
Energy
ESPB.L
ISDU.L
Utilities
ESPB.L
ISDU.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESPB.L vs. ISDU.L — Risk / Return Rank
ESPB.L
ISDU.L
ESPB.L vs. ISDU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI USA ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc (ESPB.L) and iShares MSCI USA Islamic UCITS ETF (ISDU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESPB.L | ISDU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.59 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.95 | 7.35 | -4.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.70 | 22.91 | -10.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESPB.L | ISDU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 3.30 | -1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 0.80 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
ESPB.L vs. ISDU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESPB.L drawdown since its inception was -24.51%, roughly equal to the maximum ISDU.L drawdown of -24.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESPB.L and ISDU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESPB.L | ISDU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.51% | -24.76% | +0.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.32% | -5.85% | -3.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.57% | -24.06% | +5.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.25% | 0.00% | -0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.14% | -3.88% | -3.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.17% | 1.88% | +0.29% |
Volatility
ESPB.L vs. ISDU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco MSCI USA ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc (ESPB.L) is 3.46%, while iShares MSCI USA Islamic UCITS ETF (ISDU.L) has a volatility of 5.10%. This indicates that ESPB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISDU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESPB.L | ISDU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.46% | 5.10% | -1.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.07% | 9.92% | -0.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.06% | 13.13% | -1.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.73% | 15.64% | +4.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.73% | 16.42% | +3.31% |
ESPB.L vs. ISDU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESPB.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than ISDU.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESPB.L vs. ISDU.L - Dividend Comparison
ESPB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ISDU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPB.L Invesco MSCI USA ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ISDU.L iShares MSCI USA Islamic UCITS ETF | 0.61% | 0.74% | 0.90% | 1.10% | 1.52% | 1.01% | 1.39% | 1.37% | 1.49% | 1.38% | 1.34% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESPB.L and ISDU.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ESPB.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESPB.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ISDU.L.
ESPB.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while ISDU.L tracks MSCI USA Islamic Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for ESPB.L and 0.30% for ISDU.L.
Find the right allocation for ESPB.L and ISDU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer