PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESP0.DE vs. FGM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESP0.DE vs. FGM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF (ESP0.DE) and First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund (FGM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ESP0.DE is traded in EUR, while FGM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FGM values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESP0.DE achieves a -13.12% return, which is significantly lower than FGM's 5.46% return.


ESP0.DE

1D
-0.62%
1M
-0.41%
YTD
-13.12%
6M
-16.53%
1Y
-13.94%
3Y*
16.64%
5Y*
7.55%
10Y*

FGM

1D
-0.00%
1M
1.22%
YTD
5.46%
6M
9.02%
1Y
17.10%
3Y*
18.64%
5Y*
5.19%
10Y*
7.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESP0.DE vs. FGM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ESP0.DE
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF
-13.12%13.28%57.80%28.86%-30.20%6.12%65.73%18.39%
FGM
First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund
5.46%44.18%8.06%9.89%-26.15%14.03%7.60%9.31%

Correlation

The correlation between ESP0.DE and FGM is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2019

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESP0.DE vs. FGM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESP0.DE
ESP0.DE Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
ESP0.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESP0.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESP0.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
ESP0.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESP0.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

FGM
FGM Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
FGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGM Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGM Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESP0.DE vs. FGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF (ESP0.DE) and First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund (FGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESP0.DEFGMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.18

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.53

1.10

-1.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.93

3.74

-4.67

ESP0.DE vs. FGM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESP0.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.81, which is lower than the FGM Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESP0.DE and FGM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESP0.DEFGMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.81

0.93

-1.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.24

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.41

+0.30

Drawdowns

ESP0.DE vs. FGM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESP0.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.11%, smaller than the maximum FGM drawdown of -45.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESP0.DE and FGM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESP0.DEFGMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.11%

-45.58%

+5.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.09%

-15.56%

-10.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.09%

-17.62%

-8.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.11%

-39.45%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.82%

-5.19%

-19.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.75%

-10.42%

-2.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.94%

4.58%

+10.36%

Volatility

ESP0.DE vs. FGM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF (ESP0.DE) is 4.55%, while First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund (FGM) has a volatility of 5.75%. This indicates that ESP0.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESP0.DEFGMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.55%

5.75%

-1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.06%

15.33%

-2.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.18%

18.42%

-1.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.48%

21.61%

+0.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.16%

21.24%

+1.92%

ESP0.DE vs. FGM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESP0.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than FGM's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESP0.DE vs. FGM - Dividend Comparison

ESP0.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESP0.DE
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FGM
First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund
0.64%0.66%2.56%2.82%5.44%1.43%1.33%2.30%2.18%2.11%1.33%1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESP0.DE and FGM have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ESP0.DE is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESP0.DE is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FGM.

ESP0.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while FGM is Europe Equities. ESP0.DE tracks MarketVector Global Video Gaming and eSports ESG, while FGM tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Germany Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ESP0.DE and 0.80% for FGM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESP0.DE and FGM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer