ESMV vs. TEXN
ESMV (iShares ESG MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF) and TEXN (iShares Texas Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds from iShares - ESMV tracks the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Extended ESG Reduced Carbon Target Index - Benchmark TR Gross while TEXN tracks the Russell Texas Equity Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ESMV charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for TEXN.
Performance
ESMV vs. TEXN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESMV achieves a 5.72% return, which is significantly lower than TEXN's 26.15% return.
ESMV
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 3.71%
- YTD
- 5.72%
- 6M
- 5.91%
- 1Y
- 7.59%
- 3Y*
- 11.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TEXN
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 4.62%
- YTD
- 26.15%
- 6M
- 23.70%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESMV vs. TEXN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ESMV iShares ESG MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 5.72% | 1.49% |
TEXN iShares Texas Equity ETF | 26.15% | 8.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESMV and TEXN is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESMV vs. TEXN — Risk / Return Rank
ESMV
TEXN
ESMV vs. TEXN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (ESMV) and iShares Texas Equity ETF (TEXN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESMV | TEXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.09 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.34 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESMV | TEXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 2.76 | -2.31 |
Drawdowns
ESMV vs. TEXN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESMV drawdown since its inception was -19.77%, which is greater than TEXN's maximum drawdown of -6.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESMV and TEXN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESMV | TEXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.77% | -6.34% | -13.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.01% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -0.07% | -0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.32% | -1.12% | -4.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.28% | — | — |
Volatility
ESMV vs. TEXN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESMV | TEXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.26% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.27% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.07% | 14.16% | -4.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.24% | 14.16% | -0.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.24% | 14.16% | -0.92% |
ESMV vs. TEXN - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESMV has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than TEXN's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ESMV vs. TEXN - Dividend Comparison
ESMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, more than TEXN's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESMV iShares ESG MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 1.58% | 1.56% | 1.71% | 1.75% | 1.66% | 0.24% |
TEXN iShares Texas Equity ETF | 1.01% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESMV and TEXN have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ESMV is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESMV is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for TEXN.
ESMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 1.01% for TEXN.
ESMV tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Extended ESG Reduced Carbon Target Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while TEXN tracks Russell Texas Equity Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for ESMV and 0.20% for TEXN.
Find the right allocation for ESMV and TEXN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer