PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESMV vs. QMAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ESMV vs. QMAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (ESMV) and FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ESMV vs. QMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ESMV
iShares ESG MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
-1.54%5.34%13.06%12.20%-11.08%3.20%
QMAR
FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March
2.45%10.89%16.11%35.47%-16.56%0.23%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESMV achieves a -1.54% return, which is significantly lower than QMAR's 2.45% return.


ESMV

1D
0.30%
1M
-4.99%
YTD
-1.54%
6M
-2.08%
1Y
0.35%
3Y*
8.85%
5Y*
10Y*

QMAR

1D
0.57%
1M
1.34%
YTD
2.45%
6M
4.74%
1Y
19.05%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
10.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ESMV vs. QMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESMV has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than QMAR's 0.90% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ESMV vs. QMAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESMV
ESMV Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
ESMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESMV Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
ESMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESMV Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

QMAR
QMAR Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
QMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
QMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
QMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
QMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESMV vs. QMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (ESMV) and FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESMVQMARDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.03

1.44

-1.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.13

2.29

-2.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.47

-0.45

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.04

2.11

-2.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.15

14.64

-14.49

ESMV vs. QMAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESMV Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the QMAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESMV and QMAR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESMVQMARDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

1.44

-1.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.77

-0.44

Correlation

The correlation between ESMV and QMAR is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

ESMV vs. QMAR - Dividend Comparison

ESMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, while QMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021
ESMV
iShares ESG MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
1.69%1.56%1.71%1.75%1.66%0.24%
QMAR
FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ESMV vs. QMAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESMV drawdown since its inception was -19.77%, roughly equal to the maximum QMAR drawdown of -19.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESMV and QMAR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ESMVQMARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.77%

-19.83%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.46%

-9.23%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.02%

-0.32%

-4.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.46%

-3.39%

-2.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

1.33%

+1.23%

Volatility

ESMV vs. QMAR - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (ESMV) and FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR) have volatilities of 3.38% and 3.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ESMVQMARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.38%

3.53%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.12%

4.65%

+3.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.74%

13.26%

+0.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.39%

14.04%

-0.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.39%

14.02%

-0.63%