PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESMV vs. FLLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESMV vs. FLLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (ESMV) and Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF (FLLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESMV achieves a 7.33% return, which is significantly lower than FLLV's 14.91% return.


ESMV

1D
0.22%
1M
-0.16%
6M
6.27%
YTD
7.33%
1Y
9.71%
3Y*
10.25%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.96%

FLLV

1D
0.47%
1M
0.96%
6M
8.29%
YTD
14.91%
1Y
26.00%
3Y*
15.52%
5Y*
10.49%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$7.55K$9.03K$12.67K
$621.36K$657.47K$945.62K

ESMV vs. FLLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ESMV
iShares ESG MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
7.33%5.34%13.06%12.20%-11.08%3.13%
FLLV
Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF
14.91%15.92%10.70%13.87%-8.54%4.64%

Correlation

The correlation between ESMV and FLLV is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2021

0.83

The correlation between ESMV and FLLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESMV vs. FLLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ESMV
ESMV Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
ESMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESMV Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
ESMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESMV Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

FLLV
FLLV Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FLLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLLV Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FLLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLLV Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ESMV vs. FLLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (ESMV) and Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF (FLLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ESMVFLLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.58

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

5.24

-3.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.05

20.20

-16.14

ESMV vs. FLLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESMV Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the FLLV Sharpe Ratio of 3.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESMV and FLLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESMV vs. FLLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESMV drawdown since its inception was -19.77%, smaller than the maximum FLLV drawdown of -33.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESMV and FLLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESMVFLLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.77%

-33.95%

+14.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.01%

-4.90%

-2.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.16%

-14.01%

+1.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-0.16%

-0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.18%

-3.22%

-1.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.28%

1.27%

+1.01%

Volatility

ESMV vs. FLLV - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (ESMV) and Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF (FLLV) have volatilities of 2.50% and 2.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESMVFLLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.50%

2.46%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.60%

6.15%

+0.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.04%

8.40%

+1.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.11%

13.25%

-0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.11%

15.60%

-2.49%

ESMV vs. FLLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESMV has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FLLV's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESMV vs. FLLV - Dividend Comparison

ESMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, less than FLLV's 4.84% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ESMV
iShares ESG MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
1.50%1.56%1.71%1.75%1.66%0.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FLLV
Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF
4.84%4.71%3.25%1.75%1.68%1.41%1.40%1.31%1.55%1.44%0.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESMV and FLLV have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ESMV has higher volatility (2.50%) compared to FLLV (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESMV dropped -19.77% vs FLLV's -33.95%.

On 3-year performance, FLLV leads with 15.52% vs 10.25% for ESMV. On fees, ESMV is cheaper at 0.18% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, FLLV has performed better with a 15.52% return vs 10.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ESMV is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FLLV.

FLLV has the higher dividend yield at 4.84%, compared with 1.50% for ESMV.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for ESMV and 0.29% for FLLV.

FLLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESMV and FLLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer