PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESLT vs. ONDS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ESLT vs. ONDS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT) and Ondas Holdings Inc. (ONDS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESLT achieves a 48.00% return, which is significantly higher than ONDS's -4.41% return.


ESLT

1D
-6.48%
1M
9.58%
YTD
48.00%
6M
66.16%
1Y
98.98%
3Y*
60.86%
5Y*
46.38%
10Y*
26.53%

ONDS

1D
-5.09%
1M
5.30%
YTD
-4.41%
6M
6.63%
1Y
445.61%
3Y*
104.56%
5Y*
2.67%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESLT vs. ONDS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ESLT
Elbit Systems Ltd
48.00%125.14%22.17%31.30%-4.82%34.77%-14.56%37.62%-3.45%
ONDS
Ondas Holdings Inc.
-4.41%281.25%67.32%-3.77%-76.30%-28.08%-48.17%0.00%33.33%

Correlation

The correlation between ESLT and ONDS is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2018

0.16

The correlation between ESLT and ONDS shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

ESLT:

$12.36

ONDS:

$1.54

PE Ratio

ESLT:

69.08

ONDS:

6.06

PS Ratio

ESLT:

4.93

ONDS:

15.27

Total Revenue (TTM)

ESLT:

$8.23B

ONDS:

$96.60M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ESLT:

$2.03B

ONDS:

$43.33M

EBITDA (TTM)

ESLT:

$861.06M

ONDS:

-$75.39M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESLT vs. ONDS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESLT
ESLT Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
ESLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESLT Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
ESLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESLT Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

ONDS
ONDS Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
ONDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONDS Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
ONDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONDS Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESLT vs. ONDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT) and Ondas Holdings Inc. (ONDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ESLTONDSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.39

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.83

8.42

-4.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.61

18.67

-8.06

ESLT vs. ONDS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESLT Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is lower than the ONDS Sharpe Ratio of 3.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESLT and ONDS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESLT vs. ONDS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESLT drawdown since its inception was -53.79%, smaller than the maximum ONDS drawdown of -98.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESLT and ONDS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESLTONDSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.79%

-98.28%

+44.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.98%

-53.37%

+27.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.98%

-83.28%

+57.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.89%

-96.99%

+64.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.71%

-52.15%

+36.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.91%

-71.41%

+57.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.36%

24.01%

-14.65%

Volatility

ESLT vs. ONDS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT) is 19.89%, while Ondas Holdings Inc. (ONDS) has a volatility of 44.08%. This indicates that ESLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ONDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESLTONDSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.89%

44.08%

-24.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.93%

78.27%

-42.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.11%

127.45%

-83.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.66%

113.81%

-80.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.42%

120.73%

-91.31%

Dividends

ESLT vs. ONDS - Dividend Comparison

ESLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, while ONDS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESLT
Elbit Systems Ltd
0.36%0.47%0.77%0.94%1.22%1.03%1.28%1.14%1.54%1.32%1.57%1.63%
ONDS
Ondas Holdings Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ESLT vs. ONDS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Elbit Systems Ltd and Ondas Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
2.19B
50.12M
(ESLT) Total Revenue
(ONDS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ESLT and ONDS have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ONDS has higher volatility (44.08%) compared to ESLT (19.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESLT dropped -53.79% vs ONDS's -98.28%.

ONDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.55 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESLT and ONDS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer