PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESLT vs. GPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESLT vs. GPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESLT achieves a 48.00% return, which is significantly higher than GPIX's 8.64% return.


ESLT

1D
-6.48%
1M
13.87%
YTD
48.00%
6M
66.16%
1Y
88.74%
3Y*
60.86%
5Y*
46.38%
10Y*
26.53%

GPIX

1D
0.55%
1M
0.57%
YTD
8.64%
6M
9.22%
1Y
23.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESLT vs. GPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ESLT
Elbit Systems Ltd
48.00%125.14%22.17%13.11%
GPIX
Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF
8.64%16.25%21.77%13.04%

Correlation

The correlation between ESLT and GPIX is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2023

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESLT vs. GPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESLT
ESLT Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
ESLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESLT Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
ESLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESLT Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

GPIX
GPIX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
GPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
GPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESLT vs. GPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ESLTGPIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.41

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.83

2.97

+0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.61

14.51

-3.90

ESLT vs. GPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESLT Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the GPIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESLT and GPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESLT vs. GPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESLT drawdown since its inception was -53.79%, which is greater than GPIX's maximum drawdown of -17.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESLT and GPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESLTGPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.79%

-17.50%

-36.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.98%

-7.71%

-18.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.71%

-1.63%

-14.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.91%

-1.49%

-12.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.36%

1.57%

+7.79%

Volatility

ESLT vs. GPIX - Volatility Comparison

Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT) has a higher volatility of 19.89% compared to Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) at 3.77%. This indicates that ESLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESLTGPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.89%

3.77%

+16.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.93%

8.51%

+27.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.11%

10.62%

+33.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.66%

13.86%

+19.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.42%

13.86%

+15.56%

Dividends

ESLT vs. GPIX - Dividend Comparison

ESLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than GPIX's 8.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESLT
Elbit Systems Ltd
0.36%0.47%0.77%0.94%1.22%1.03%1.28%1.14%1.54%1.32%1.57%1.63%
GPIX
Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF
8.09%8.01%7.45%1.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESLT and GPIX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ESLT has higher volatility (19.89%) compared to GPIX (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESLT dropped -53.79% vs GPIX's -17.50%.

ESLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESLT and GPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer