ESLT vs. AVGX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ESLT (Elbit Systems Ltd) is a stock, while AVGX (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AVGO ETF) is Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Defiance. Over the past year, ESLT returned 96.01% vs 84.80% for AVGX. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ESLT vs. AVGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AVGO ETF (AVGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESLT achieves a 45.20% return, which is significantly higher than AVGX's 26.51% return.

ESLT

• 1D: 0.98%
• 1M: -1.56%
• YTD: 45.20%
• 6M: 74.96%
• 1Y: 96.01%
• 3Y*: 63.50%
• 5Y*: 46.33%
• 10Y*: 25.86%

AVGX

• 1D: -25.53%
• 1M: -8.40%
• YTD: 26.51%
• 6M: 0.84%
• 1Y: 84.80%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESLT vs. AVGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ESLT Elbit Systems Ltd	45.20%	125.14%	30.88%
AVGX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AVGO ETF	26.51%	46.98%	69.92%

Correlation

The correlation between ESLT and AVGX is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2024	0.11

Return for Risk

ESLT vs. AVGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESLT

ESLT Risk / Return Rank: 88
ESLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
ESLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
ESLT Omega Ratio Rank: 87
ESLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
ESLT Martin Ratio Rank: 88

AVGX

AVGX Risk / Return Rank: 31
AVGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
AVGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
AVGX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
AVGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
AVGX Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESLT vs. AVGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AVGO ETF (AVGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ESLT	AVGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.29	0.95	+1.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.22	1.72	+1.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.23	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.72	1.58	+2.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.71	3.51	+7.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ESLT vs. AVGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESLT Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is higher than the AVGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESLT and AVGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ESLT	AVGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.29	0.95	+1.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.41	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.62	0.86	-0.24

Drawdowns

ESLT vs. AVGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESLT drawdown since its inception was -53.79%, smaller than the maximum AVGX drawdown of -70.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESLT and AVGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ESLT	AVGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.79%	-70.97%	+17.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.98%	-54.09%	+28.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.98%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.89%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.30%	-26.15%	+8.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.91%	-22.72%	+8.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.00%	24.26%	-15.26%

Volatility

ESLT vs. AVGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT) is 16.10%, while Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AVGO ETF (AVGX) has a volatility of 38.30%. This indicates that ESLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ESLT	AVGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.10%	38.30%	-22.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.65%	68.61%	-34.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.23%	89.63%	-47.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.12%	106.35%	-73.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.11%	106.35%	-77.24%

Dividends

ESLT vs. AVGX - Dividend Comparison

ESLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than AVGX's 1.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AVGX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AVGO ETF	1.31%	1.65%	0.81%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ESLT Elbit Systems Ltd	0.37%	0.47%	0.77%	0.94%	1.22%	1.03%	1.28%	1.14%	1.54%	1.32%	1.57%	1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ESLT and AVGX in my portfolio?

ESLT and AVGX have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ESLT or AVGX?

AVGX has higher volatility (38.30%) compared to ESLT (16.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESLT dropped -53.79% vs AVGX's -70.97%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ESLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.