ESK vs. IBLC
ESK (REX-Osprey ETH + Staking ETF) and IBLC (iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. ESK is actively managed, while IBLC is passively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ESK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for IBLC.
Performance
ESK vs. IBLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESK achieves a -39.23% return, which is significantly lower than IBLC's 32.34% return.
ESK
- 1D
- -6.26%
- 1M
- -24.17%
- YTD
- -39.23%
- 6M
- -42.40%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBLC
- 1D
- -3.00%
- 1M
- 13.52%
- YTD
- 32.34%
- 6M
- 15.25%
- 1Y
- 73.27%
- 3Y*
- 48.31%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESK vs. IBLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ESK REX-Osprey ETH + Staking ETF | -39.23% | -23.15% |
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF | 32.34% | -17.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESK and IBLC is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2025 | 0.75 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESK vs. IBLC — Risk / Return Rank
ESK
IBLC
ESK vs. IBLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX-Osprey ETH + Staking ETF (ESK) and iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESK | IBLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.99 | 0.40 | -1.39 |
Drawdowns
ESK vs. IBLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESK drawdown since its inception was -61.14%, roughly equal to the maximum IBLC drawdown of -62.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESK and IBLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESK | IBLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.14% | -62.54% | +1.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -44.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -51.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.14% | -12.99% | -48.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.19% | -25.89% | -14.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 22.56% | — |
Volatility
ESK vs. IBLC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESK | IBLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.67% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 40.76% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.24% | 54.94% | +12.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.24% | 64.49% | +2.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.24% | 64.49% | +2.75% |
ESK vs. IBLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IBLC's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESK vs. IBLC - Dividend Comparison
ESK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than IBLC's 4.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESK REX-Osprey ETH + Staking ETF | 0.97% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF | 4.77% | 6.31% | 1.60% | 1.79% | 0.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESK and IBLC have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBLC is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBLC is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ESK.
IBLC has the higher dividend yield at 4.77%, compared with 0.97% for ESK.
They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ESK and 0.47% for IBLC.
Find the right allocation for ESK and IBLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer