PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESIT.L vs. KROP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESIT.L vs. KROP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Europe Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (ESIT.L) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (KROP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ESIT.L is traded in GBP, while KROP.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the KROP.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESIT.L achieves a 24.59% return, which is significantly higher than KROP.L's 17.71% return.


ESIT.L

1D
-1.41%
1M
-13.39%
6M
11.76%
YTD
24.59%
1Y
40.96%
3Y*
17.17%
5Y*
9.01%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.01%

KROP.L

1D
-1.45%
1M
2.07%
6M
11.10%
YTD
17.71%
1Y
10.69%
3Y*
-1.48%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-8.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
£268.93K£310.46K£410.71K
£2.37K£1.60K£2.77K

ESIT.L vs. KROP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ESIT.L
iShares MSCI Europe Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF
24.59%14.73%2.74%32.37%-9.14%
KROP.L
Global X AgTech & Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
17.71%-0.05%-6.73%-26.39%-15.16%

Correlation

The correlation between ESIT.L and KROP.L is 0.18, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2022

0.32

The correlation between ESIT.L and KROP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ESIT.L vs. KROP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ESIT.L
KROP.L

Technology

93.2%

-

Communication Services

4.6%

-

Industrials

2.2%
39.6%

Basic Materials

-

33.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

25.8%

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

0.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

ESIT.L
93.2%
KROP.L

-

Communication Services

ESIT.L
4.6%
KROP.L

-

Industrials

ESIT.L
2.2%
KROP.L
39.6%

Basic Materials

ESIT.L

-

KROP.L
33.1%

Consumer Cyclical

ESIT.L

-

KROP.L
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

ESIT.L

-

KROP.L
25.8%

Energy

ESIT.L

-

KROP.L

-

Financial Services

ESIT.L

-

KROP.L

-

Healthcare

ESIT.L

-

KROP.L
0.4%

Real Estate

ESIT.L

-

KROP.L

-

Utilities

ESIT.L

-

KROP.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESIT.L vs. KROP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ESIT.L
ESIT.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
ESIT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESIT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESIT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
ESIT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESIT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

KROP.L
KROP.L Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
KROP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KROP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
KROP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
KROP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
KROP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ESIT.L vs. KROP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (ESIT.L) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (KROP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ESIT.LKROP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.12

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

1.27

+1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.29

2.37

+5.91

ESIT.L vs. KROP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESIT.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is higher than the KROP.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESIT.L and KROP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESIT.L vs. KROP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESIT.L drawdown since its inception was -37.50%, smaller than the maximum KROP.L drawdown of -50.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESIT.L and KROP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESIT.LKROP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.50%

-50.76%

+13.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.84%

-8.40%

-9.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.76%

-25.48%

+0.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.84%

-37.57%

+19.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.51%

-34.59%

+23.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.87%

4.19%

+0.68%

Volatility

ESIT.L vs. KROP.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Europe Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (ESIT.L) has a higher volatility of 9.97% compared to Global X AgTech & Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (KROP.L) at 4.35%. This indicates that ESIT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KROP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESIT.LKROP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.97%

4.35%

+5.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.85%

13.24%

+9.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.39%

16.78%

+10.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.04%

20.18%

+6.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.65%

20.18%

+6.47%

ESIT.L vs. KROP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESIT.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than KROP.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESIT.L vs. KROP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ESIT.L nor KROP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ESIT.L and KROP.L have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ESIT.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESIT.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for KROP.L.

ESIT.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while KROP.L tracks Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation v2 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for ESIT.L and 0.50% for KROP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESIT.L and KROP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer