PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESIT.L vs. IWDA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESIT.L vs. IWDA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Europe Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (ESIT.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ESIT.L is traded in GBP, while IWDA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IWDA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESIT.L achieves a 51.10% return, which is significantly higher than IWDA.L's 10.12% return.


ESIT.L

1D
-0.34%
1M
23.02%
YTD
51.10%
6M
49.13%
1Y
68.29%
3Y*
24.63%
5Y*
15.12%
10Y*

IWDA.L

1D
-0.27%
1M
4.87%
YTD
10.12%
6M
10.50%
1Y
27.28%
3Y*
17.82%
5Y*
13.03%
10Y*
14.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESIT.L vs. IWDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ESIT.L
iShares MSCI Europe Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF
51.10%14.83%2.77%32.26%-24.43%27.26%8.52%
IWDA.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
10.12%12.41%21.19%18.05%-8.38%23.34%3.23%

Correlation

The correlation between ESIT.L and IWDA.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2020

0.69

The correlation between ESIT.L and IWDA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

ESIT.L vs. IWDA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ESIT.L
IWDA.L

Technology

92.0%
32.9%

Communication Services

5.3%
9.3%

Industrials

2.7%
9.7%

Basic Materials

-

2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.8%

Energy

-

3.9%

Financial Services

-

14.9%

Healthcare

-

8.6%

Real Estate

-

1.2%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Technology

ESIT.L
92.0%
IWDA.L
32.9%

Communication Services

ESIT.L
5.3%
IWDA.L
9.3%

Industrials

ESIT.L
2.7%
IWDA.L
9.7%

Basic Materials

ESIT.L

-

IWDA.L
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

ESIT.L

-

IWDA.L
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

ESIT.L

-

IWDA.L
4.8%

Energy

ESIT.L

-

IWDA.L
3.9%

Financial Services

ESIT.L

-

IWDA.L
14.9%

Healthcare

ESIT.L

-

IWDA.L
8.6%

Real Estate

ESIT.L

-

IWDA.L
1.2%

Utilities

ESIT.L

-

IWDA.L
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESIT.L vs. IWDA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESIT.L
ESIT.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ESIT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESIT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESIT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
ESIT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESIT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

IWDA.L
IWDA.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
IWDA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWDA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWDA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
IWDA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWDA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESIT.L vs. IWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (ESIT.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESIT.LIWDA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.44

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.80

4.26

+1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.60

16.05

-1.45

ESIT.L vs. IWDA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESIT.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.78, which is comparable to the IWDA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESIT.L and IWDA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESIT.LIWDA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.78

2.34

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.90

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.86

-0.14

Drawdowns

ESIT.L vs. IWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESIT.L drawdown since its inception was -37.50%, which is greater than IWDA.L's maximum drawdown of -26.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESIT.L and IWDA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESIT.LIWDA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.50%

-26.18%

-11.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.71%

-6.37%

-5.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.87%

-18.91%

-5.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.50%

-18.91%

-18.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-0.27%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.53%

-3.39%

-8.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.66%

1.70%

+2.96%

Volatility

ESIT.L vs. IWDA.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Europe Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (ESIT.L) has a higher volatility of 9.46% compared to iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L) at 3.47%. This indicates that ESIT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESIT.LIWDA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.46%

3.47%

+5.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.86%

8.85%

+11.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.50%

11.65%

+12.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.01%

14.49%

+10.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.65%

15.51%

+9.14%

ESIT.L vs. IWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESIT.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than IWDA.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ESIT.L vs. IWDA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ESIT.L nor IWDA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ESIT.L and IWDA.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ESIT.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESIT.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IWDA.L.

ESIT.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while IWDA.L is Global Equities. ESIT.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while IWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.18% for ESIT.L and 0.20% for IWDA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESIT.L and IWDA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer