ESIS.L vs. ICSU.L
ESIS.L (iShares MSCI Europe Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) and ICSU.L (iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds from iShares - ESIS.L tracks the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR while ICSU.L tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Staples Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESIS.L returned 0.80%/yr vs 7.91%/yr for ICSU.L. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ESIS.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for ICSU.L.
Performance
ESIS.L vs. ICSU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ESIS.L is traded in GBP, while ICSU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ICSU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESIS.L achieves a -2.90% return, which is significantly lower than ICSU.L's 6.60% return.
ESIS.L
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -0.85%
- YTD
- -2.90%
- 6M
- -2.91%
- 1Y
- -2.62%
- 3Y*
- -0.37%
- 5Y*
- 0.80%
- 10Y*
- —
ICSU.L
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -1.78%
- YTD
- 6.60%
- 6M
- 6.25%
- 1Y
- 3.19%
- 3Y*
- 5.52%
- 5Y*
- 7.91%
- 10Y*
- —
ESIS.L vs. ICSU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESIS.L iShares MSCI Europe Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | -2.90% | 12.15% | -6.75% | -1.03% | -2.95% | 12.22% | 2.78% |
ICSU.L iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 6.60% | -3.20% | 16.26% | -5.83% | 11.78% | 19.63% | -0.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESIS.L and ICSU.L is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2020 | 0.50 |
The correlation between ESIS.L and ICSU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
ESIS.L vs. ICSU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESIS.L
ICSU.L
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
ESIS.L
ICSU.L
Consumer Cyclical
ESIS.L
ICSU.L
Basic Materials
ESIS.L
-
ICSU.L
-
Communication Services
ESIS.L
-
ICSU.L
-
Energy
ESIS.L
-
ICSU.L
-
Financial Services
ESIS.L
-
ICSU.L
-
Healthcare
ESIS.L
-
ICSU.L
-
Industrials
ESIS.L
-
ICSU.L
-
Real Estate
ESIS.L
-
ICSU.L
-
Technology
ESIS.L
-
ICSU.L
-
Utilities
ESIS.L
-
ICSU.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESIS.L vs. ICSU.L — Risk / Return Rank
ESIS.L
ICSU.L
ESIS.L vs. ICSU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIS.L) and iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICSU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESIS.L | ICSU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.05 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | 0.34 | -0.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.43 | 0.82 | -1.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESIS.L | ICSU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 | 0.22 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 0.59 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.48 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
ESIS.L vs. ICSU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESIS.L drawdown since its inception was -17.71%, roughly equal to the maximum ICSU.L drawdown of -18.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESIS.L and ICSU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESIS.L | ICSU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.71% | -18.54% | +0.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.78% | -9.24% | -4.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.78% | -11.59% | -2.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.71% | -13.70% | -4.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.86% | -7.40% | -5.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.44% | -4.93% | -2.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.04% | 3.87% | +2.17% |
Volatility
ESIS.L vs. ICSU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Europe Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIS.L) is 4.54%, while iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICSU.L) has a volatility of 6.57%. This indicates that ESIS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICSU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESIS.L | ICSU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.54% | 6.57% | -2.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.16% | 11.97% | -0.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.58% | 14.37% | -0.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.66% | 13.45% | -0.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.67% | 14.31% | -1.64% |
ESIS.L vs. ICSU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESIS.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than ICSU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ESIS.L vs. ICSU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ESIS.L nor ICSU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ESIS.L and ICSU.L have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ICSU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ICSU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for ESIS.L.
ESIS.L tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while ICSU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Staples Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for ESIS.L and 0.15% for ICSU.L.
Find the right allocation for ESIS.L and ICSU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer