PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESIS.L vs. EDM2.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESIS.L vs. EDM2.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Europe Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIS.L) and iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EDM2.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ESIS.L is traded in GBP, while EDM2.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the EDM2.DE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESIS.L achieves a -2.90% return, which is significantly lower than EDM2.DE's 25.35% return.


ESIS.L

1D
-0.53%
1M
-0.85%
YTD
-2.90%
6M
-2.91%
1Y
-2.62%
3Y*
-0.37%
5Y*
0.80%
10Y*

EDM2.DE

1D
-1.33%
1M
6.38%
YTD
25.35%
6M
26.89%
1Y
51.19%
3Y*
20.47%
5Y*
7.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESIS.L vs. EDM2.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ESIS.L
iShares MSCI Europe Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
-2.90%12.15%-6.75%-1.03%-2.95%12.22%2.78%
EDM2.DE
iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
25.35%26.05%8.42%2.48%-11.40%-2.65%4.02%

Correlation

The correlation between ESIS.L and EDM2.DE is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2020

0.22

The correlation between ESIS.L and EDM2.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESIS.L vs. EDM2.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESIS.L
ESIS.L Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
ESIS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESIS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESIS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
ESIS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESIS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

EDM2.DE
EDM2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
EDM2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDM2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDM2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
EDM2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDM2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESIS.L vs. EDM2.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIS.L) and iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EDM2.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESIS.LEDM2.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.54

-0.56

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.19

4.55

-4.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.43

16.29

-16.72

ESIS.L vs. EDM2.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESIS.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.19, which is lower than the EDM2.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESIS.L and EDM2.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESIS.LEDM2.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.19

2.95

-3.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

0.46

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.51

-0.34

Drawdowns

ESIS.L vs. EDM2.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESIS.L drawdown since its inception was -17.71%, smaller than the maximum EDM2.DE drawdown of -28.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESIS.L and EDM2.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESIS.LEDM2.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.71%

-28.07%

+10.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.78%

-11.19%

-2.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.78%

-17.03%

+3.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.71%

-25.01%

+7.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.86%

-2.47%

-10.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.44%

-11.95%

+4.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.04%

3.13%

+2.91%

Volatility

ESIS.L vs. EDM2.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Europe Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIS.L) is 4.54%, while iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EDM2.DE) has a volatility of 7.27%. This indicates that ESIS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDM2.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESIS.LEDM2.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.54%

7.27%

-2.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.16%

14.81%

-3.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.58%

17.28%

-3.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.66%

16.58%

-3.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.67%

18.68%

-6.01%

ESIS.L vs. EDM2.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ESIS.L and EDM2.DE have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ESIS.L vs. EDM2.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ESIS.L nor EDM2.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ESIS.L and EDM2.DE have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESIS.L and EDM2.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.

ESIS.L is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while EDM2.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. ESIS.L tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while EDM2.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Enhanced Focus.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESIS.L and EDM2.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer