PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDM2.DE vs. SPMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDM2.DE vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EDM2.DE) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EDM2.DE is traded in EUR, while SPMO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPMO values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDM2.DE achieves a 28.33% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 38.88% return.


EDM2.DE

1D
0.59%
1M
3.04%
YTD
28.33%
6M
30.31%
1Y
46.79%
3Y*
21.35%
5Y*
7.61%
10Y*

SPMO

1D
3.73%
1M
9.22%
YTD
38.88%
6M
36.81%
1Y
50.15%
3Y*
41.97%
5Y*
24.96%
10Y*
21.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDM2.DE vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EDM2.DE
iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
28.33%19.78%13.37%4.74%-16.09%4.73%7.76%7.69%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
38.88%11.56%55.44%14.03%-4.90%31.82%17.68%4.69%

Correlation

The correlation between EDM2.DE and SPMO is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2019

0.36

Over the past year, EDM2.DE and SPMO have become more correlated (0.58) than their long-term average of 0.36, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDM2.DE vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDM2.DE
EDM2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
EDM2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDM2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDM2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
EDM2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDM2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDM2.DE vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EDM2.DE) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EDM2.DESPMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.44

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.29

4.33

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.78

13.79

+0.98

EDM2.DE vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDM2.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the SPMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDM2.DE and SPMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EDM2.DE vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDM2.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.34%, roughly equal to the maximum SPMO drawdown of -32.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDM2.DE and SPMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDM2.DESPMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.34%

-32.02%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.86%

-11.63%

+0.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.46%

-25.02%

+5.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.47%

-25.02%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.97%

-0.73%

-3.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.03%

-4.50%

-6.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

3.65%

-0.49%

Volatility

EDM2.DE vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EDM2.DE) is 8.97%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 11.32%. This indicates that EDM2.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDM2.DESPMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.97%

11.32%

-2.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.91%

17.04%

-0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.22%

20.51%

-1.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.21%

20.04%

-2.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.33%

21.14%

-1.81%

EDM2.DE vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDM2.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EDM2.DE vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

EDM2.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDM2.DE
iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.66%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


EDM2.DE and SPMO have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for EDM2.DE.

EDM2.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. EDM2.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Enhanced Focus, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EDM2.DE and 0.13% for SPMO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDM2.DE and SPMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer