ESIN.L vs. TDGB.L
ESIN.L (iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR Acc) and TDGB.L (VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESIN.L is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while TDGB.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESIN.L returned 13.02%/yr vs 17.70%/yr for TDGB.L. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ESIN.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for TDGB.L.
Performance
ESIN.L vs. TDGB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESIN.L achieves a 7.95% return, which is significantly lower than TDGB.L's 8.92% return.
ESIN.L
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- YTD
- 7.95%
- 6M
- 10.12%
- 1Y
- 18.56%
- 3Y*
- 19.65%
- 5Y*
- 13.02%
- 10Y*
- —
TDGB.L
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 0.92%
- YTD
- 8.92%
- 6M
- 11.81%
- 1Y
- 29.32%
- 3Y*
- 20.13%
- 5Y*
- 17.70%
- 10Y*
- —
ESIN.L vs. TDGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESIN.L iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR Acc | 7.95% | 31.04% | 9.74% | 24.40% | -11.34% | 9.01% |
TDGB.L VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF | 8.92% | 30.88% | 10.65% | 9.06% | 22.49% | 7.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESIN.L and TDGB.L is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021 | 0.57 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ESIN.L and TDGB.L has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
ESIN.L vs. TDGB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESIN.L
TDGB.L
Industrials
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
ESIN.L
TDGB.L
Communication Services
ESIN.L
TDGB.L
Financial Services
ESIN.L
TDGB.L
Consumer Cyclical
ESIN.L
TDGB.L
Consumer Defensive
ESIN.L
TDGB.L
Technology
ESIN.L
TDGB.L
Basic Materials
ESIN.L
TDGB.L
Energy
ESIN.L
-
TDGB.L
Healthcare
ESIN.L
-
TDGB.L
Real Estate
ESIN.L
-
TDGB.L
Utilities
ESIN.L
-
TDGB.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESIN.L vs. TDGB.L — Risk / Return Rank
ESIN.L
TDGB.L
ESIN.L vs. TDGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR Acc (ESIN.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESIN.L | TDGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.59 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.31 | 6.26 | -4.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.64 | 20.72 | -16.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESIN.L | TDGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 | 3.15 | -2.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 1.55 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.98 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
ESIN.L vs. TDGB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESIN.L drawdown since its inception was -24.82%, smaller than the maximum TDGB.L drawdown of -29.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESIN.L and TDGB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESIN.L | TDGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.82% | -29.60% | +4.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.11% | -4.66% | -9.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.55% | -12.41% | -4.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.82% | -12.41% | -12.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.57% | -1.47% | -2.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.41% | -3.70% | -1.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.99% | 1.41% | +2.58% |
Volatility
ESIN.L vs. TDGB.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR Acc (ESIN.L) has a higher volatility of 6.24% compared to VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L) at 2.49%. This indicates that ESIN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESIN.L | TDGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.24% | 2.49% | +3.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.70% | 7.01% | +8.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.73% | 9.28% | +9.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.41% | 11.42% | +6.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.36% | 14.44% | +3.92% |
ESIN.L vs. TDGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESIN.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than TDGB.L's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESIN.L vs. TDGB.L - Dividend Comparison
ESIN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TDGB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESIN.L iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TDGB.L VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF | 3.20% | 3.50% | 4.27% | 4.93% | 4.40% | 4.06% | 4.16% | 4.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESIN.L and TDGB.L have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ESIN.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESIN.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for TDGB.L.
ESIN.L is categorized as Industrials Equities, while TDGB.L is Global Equities. ESIN.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while TDGB.L tracks Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for ESIN.L and 0.38% for TDGB.L.
Find the right allocation for ESIN.L and TDGB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer