ESIF.L vs. XUFB.L
ESIF.L (iShares MSCI Europe Financials Sector UCITS ETF) and XUFB.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Banks UCITS ETF 1D) are both Financials Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Financials NR USD, from iShares and DWS respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESIF.L returned 19.63%/yr vs 10.89%/yr for XUFB.L. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ESIF.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XUFB.L.
Performance
ESIF.L vs. XUFB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ESIF.L is traded in GBP, while XUFB.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XUFB.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESIF.L achieves a 3.13% return, which is significantly higher than XUFB.L's -0.52% return.
ESIF.L
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 3.69%
- YTD
- 3.13%
- 6M
- 9.24%
- 1Y
- 25.77%
- 3Y*
- 29.07%
- 5Y*
- 19.63%
- 10Y*
- —
XUFB.L
- 1D
- 4.38%
- 1M
- 2.37%
- YTD
- -0.52%
- 6M
- 2.50%
- 1Y
- 27.56%
- 3Y*
- 27.41%
- 5Y*
- 10.89%
- 10Y*
- —
ESIF.L vs. XUFB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESIF.L iShares MSCI Europe Financials Sector UCITS ETF | 3.13% | 54.55% | 20.09% | 18.81% | 3.59% | 20.48% | 2.82% |
XUFB.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Banks UCITS ETF 1D | -0.52% | 23.40% | 40.02% | 5.21% | -10.18% | 37.53% | 5.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESIF.L and XUFB.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2020 | 0.60 |
The correlation between ESIF.L and XUFB.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
ESIF.L vs. XUFB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESIF.L
XUFB.L
Financial Services
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
ESIF.L
XUFB.L
Technology
ESIF.L
XUFB.L
-
Industrials
ESIF.L
XUFB.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
ESIF.L
XUFB.L
-
Basic Materials
ESIF.L
-
XUFB.L
-
Communication Services
ESIF.L
-
XUFB.L
-
Consumer Defensive
ESIF.L
-
XUFB.L
-
Energy
ESIF.L
-
XUFB.L
-
Healthcare
ESIF.L
-
XUFB.L
-
Real Estate
ESIF.L
-
XUFB.L
-
Utilities
ESIF.L
-
XUFB.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESIF.L vs. XUFB.L — Risk / Return Rank
ESIF.L
XUFB.L
ESIF.L vs. XUFB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe Financials Sector UCITS ETF (ESIF.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Banks UCITS ETF 1D (XUFB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESIF.L | XUFB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.24 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.20 | 1.92 | +0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.65 | 5.08 | +2.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESIF.L | XUFB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50 | 1.36 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.07 | 0.45 | +0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.17 | 0.44 | +0.74 |
Drawdowns
ESIF.L vs. XUFB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESIF.L drawdown since its inception was -23.55%, smaller than the maximum XUFB.L drawdown of -41.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESIF.L and XUFB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESIF.L | XUFB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.55% | -41.84% | +18.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.68% | -14.33% | +2.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.26% | -27.91% | +13.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.55% | -34.18% | +10.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.84% | -3.68% | +1.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.12% | -12.33% | +8.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.36% | 5.41% | -2.05% |
Volatility
ESIF.L vs. XUFB.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Europe Financials Sector UCITS ETF (ESIF.L) is 5.32%, while Xtrackers MSCI USA Banks UCITS ETF 1D (XUFB.L) has a volatility of 6.55%. This indicates that ESIF.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XUFB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESIF.L | XUFB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.32% | 6.55% | -1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.15% | 15.77% | -1.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.09% | 20.12% | -3.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.32% | 24.14% | -5.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.22% | 28.85% | -10.63% |
ESIF.L vs. XUFB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESIF.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than XUFB.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ESIF.L vs. XUFB.L - Dividend Comparison
ESIF.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XUFB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESIF.L iShares MSCI Europe Financials Sector UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XUFB.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Banks UCITS ETF 1D | 1.76% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 2.54% | 3.43% | 1.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESIF.L and XUFB.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XUFB.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XUFB.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for ESIF.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Financials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for ESIF.L and 0.12% for XUFB.L.
Find the right allocation for ESIF.L and XUFB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer