ESIF.L vs. TDGB.L
ESIF.L (iShares MSCI Europe Financials Sector UCITS ETF) and TDGB.L (VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESIF.L is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while TDGB.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESIF.L returned 19.63%/yr vs 17.70%/yr for TDGB.L. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ESIF.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for TDGB.L.
Performance
ESIF.L vs. TDGB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESIF.L achieves a 3.13% return, which is significantly lower than TDGB.L's 8.92% return.
ESIF.L
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 3.69%
- YTD
- 3.13%
- 6M
- 9.24%
- 1Y
- 25.77%
- 3Y*
- 29.07%
- 5Y*
- 19.63%
- 10Y*
- —
TDGB.L
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 0.92%
- YTD
- 8.92%
- 6M
- 11.81%
- 1Y
- 29.32%
- 3Y*
- 20.13%
- 5Y*
- 17.70%
- 10Y*
- —
ESIF.L vs. TDGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESIF.L iShares MSCI Europe Financials Sector UCITS ETF | 3.13% | 54.55% | 20.09% | 18.81% | 3.59% | 20.48% | 2.82% |
TDGB.L VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF | 8.92% | 30.88% | 10.65% | 9.06% | 22.49% | 19.59% | 1.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESIF.L and TDGB.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2020 | 0.70 |
The correlation between ESIF.L and TDGB.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.71 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ESIF.L vs. TDGB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESIF.L
TDGB.L
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
ESIF.L
TDGB.L
Technology
ESIF.L
TDGB.L
Industrials
ESIF.L
TDGB.L
Consumer Cyclical
ESIF.L
TDGB.L
Basic Materials
ESIF.L
-
TDGB.L
Communication Services
ESIF.L
-
TDGB.L
Consumer Defensive
ESIF.L
-
TDGB.L
Energy
ESIF.L
-
TDGB.L
Healthcare
ESIF.L
-
TDGB.L
Real Estate
ESIF.L
-
TDGB.L
Utilities
ESIF.L
-
TDGB.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESIF.L vs. TDGB.L — Risk / Return Rank
ESIF.L
TDGB.L
ESIF.L vs. TDGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe Financials Sector UCITS ETF (ESIF.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESIF.L | TDGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.59 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.20 | 6.26 | -4.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.65 | 20.72 | -13.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESIF.L | TDGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50 | 3.15 | -1.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.07 | 1.55 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.17 | 0.98 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
ESIF.L vs. TDGB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESIF.L drawdown since its inception was -23.55%, smaller than the maximum TDGB.L drawdown of -29.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESIF.L and TDGB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESIF.L | TDGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.55% | -29.60% | +6.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.68% | -4.66% | -7.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.26% | -12.41% | -1.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.55% | -12.41% | -11.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.84% | -1.47% | -0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.12% | -3.70% | -0.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.36% | 1.41% | +1.95% |
Volatility
ESIF.L vs. TDGB.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Europe Financials Sector UCITS ETF (ESIF.L) has a higher volatility of 5.32% compared to VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L) at 2.49%. This indicates that ESIF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESIF.L | TDGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.32% | 2.49% | +2.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.15% | 7.01% | +7.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.09% | 9.28% | +7.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.32% | 11.42% | +6.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.22% | 14.44% | +3.78% |
ESIF.L vs. TDGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESIF.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than TDGB.L's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESIF.L vs. TDGB.L - Dividend Comparison
ESIF.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TDGB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESIF.L iShares MSCI Europe Financials Sector UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TDGB.L VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF | 3.20% | 3.50% | 4.27% | 4.93% | 4.40% | 4.06% | 4.16% | 4.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESIF.L and TDGB.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ESIF.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESIF.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for TDGB.L.
ESIF.L is categorized as Financials Equities, while TDGB.L is Global Equities. ESIF.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while TDGB.L tracks Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for ESIF.L and 0.38% for TDGB.L.
Find the right allocation for ESIF.L and TDGB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer