PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESIE.L vs. ENGW.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESIE.L vs. ENGW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIE.L) and SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF (ENGW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESIE.L achieves a 35.58% return, which is significantly higher than ENGW.L's 31.48% return.


ESIE.L

1D
2.01%
1M
-0.45%
YTD
35.58%
6M
31.87%
1Y
58.97%
3Y*
18.27%
5Y*
20.09%
10Y*

ENGW.L

1D
2.24%
1M
0.93%
YTD
31.48%
6M
29.41%
1Y
47.44%
3Y*
16.05%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESIE.L vs. ENGW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ESIE.L
iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
35.58%20.13%-9.70%6.04%20.44%
ENGW.L
SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF
31.48%7.20%3.55%-2.06%20.65%

Correlation

The correlation between ESIE.L and ENGW.L is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2022

0.84

The correlation between ESIE.L and ENGW.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESIE.L vs. ENGW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESIE.L
ESIE.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
ESIE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESIE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESIE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
ESIE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESIE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

ENGW.L
ENGW.L Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
ENGW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENGW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENGW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
ENGW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENGW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESIE.L vs. ENGW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIE.L) and SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF (ENGW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESIE.LENGW.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.40

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.84

3.24

+1.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.81

10.79

+4.02

ESIE.L vs. ENGW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESIE.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is comparable to the ENGW.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESIE.L and ENGW.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESIE.LENGW.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.56

2.23

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.61

+0.25

Drawdowns

ESIE.L vs. ENGW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESIE.L drawdown since its inception was -27.35%, which is greater than ENGW.L's maximum drawdown of -21.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESIE.L and ENGW.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESIE.LENGW.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.35%

-21.65%

-5.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.13%

-14.56%

+2.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.35%

-21.40%

-5.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.04%

-7.08%

+1.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.24%

-8.76%

+0.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.97%

4.38%

-0.41%

Volatility

ESIE.L vs. ENGW.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIE.L) and SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF (ENGW.L) have volatilities of 8.04% and 8.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESIE.LENGW.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.04%

8.13%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.14%

18.03%

+1.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.89%

21.27%

+1.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.32%

22.80%

+1.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.59%

22.80%

+1.79%

ESIE.L vs. ENGW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESIE.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than ENGW.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESIE.L vs. ENGW.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ESIE.L nor ENGW.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ESIE.L and ENGW.L have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ESIE.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESIE.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ENGW.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for ESIE.L and 0.30% for ENGW.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESIE.L and ENGW.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer