PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESIE.DE vs. SJPA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESIE.DE vs. SJPA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIE.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (SJPA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ESIE.DE is traded in EUR, while SJPA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SJPA.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESIE.DE achieves a 34.60% return, which is significantly higher than SJPA.L's 16.71% return.


ESIE.DE

1D
-1.99%
1M
1.06%
YTD
34.60%
6M
36.03%
1Y
46.88%
3Y*
16.90%
5Y*
19.14%
10Y*

SJPA.L

1D
2.18%
1M
0.83%
YTD
16.71%
6M
16.62%
1Y
30.82%
3Y*
14.20%
5Y*
9.71%
10Y*
9.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESIE.DE vs. SJPA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ESIE.DE
iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
34.60%15.21%-6.63%8.64%35.56%35.28%5.16%
SJPA.L
iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF
16.71%12.02%13.59%15.15%-11.05%8.23%2.67%

Correlation

The correlation between ESIE.DE and SJPA.L is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2020

0.18

The correlation between ESIE.DE and SJPA.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESIE.DE vs. SJPA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESIE.DE
ESIE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
ESIE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESIE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESIE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ESIE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESIE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

SJPA.L
SJPA.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SJPA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SJPA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
SJPA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SJPA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
SJPA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESIE.DE vs. SJPA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIE.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (SJPA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ESIE.DESJPA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.32

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.78

3.12

+0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.72

10.45

+1.27

ESIE.DE vs. SJPA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESIE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the SJPA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESIE.DE and SJPA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESIE.DE vs. SJPA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESIE.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.16%, smaller than the maximum SJPA.L drawdown of -43.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESIE.DE and SJPA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESIE.DESJPA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.16%

-43.90%

+17.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.34%

-9.83%

-2.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.16%

-19.25%

-6.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.16%

-19.25%

-6.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.50%

-0.73%

-6.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.66%

-14.38%

+7.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.99%

2.94%

+1.05%

Volatility

ESIE.DE vs. SJPA.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIE.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.16% compared to iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (SJPA.L) at 4.22%. This indicates that ESIE.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SJPA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESIE.DESJPA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.16%

4.22%

+2.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.12%

14.82%

+5.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.02%

18.20%

+4.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.78%

21.35%

+2.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.15%

18.97%

+5.18%

ESIE.DE vs. SJPA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESIE.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than SJPA.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ESIE.DE vs. SJPA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ESIE.DE nor SJPA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ESIE.DE and SJPA.L have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SJPA.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SJPA.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for ESIE.DE.

ESIE.DE is categorized as Energy Equities, while SJPA.L is Japan Equities. ESIE.DE tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while SJPA.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for ESIE.DE and 0.15% for SJPA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESIE.DE and SJPA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer