PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESGV vs. VNQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESGV vs. VNQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESGV achieves a 7.69% return, which is significantly lower than VNQ's 10.80% return.


ESGV

1D
-0.05%
1M
-1.17%
YTD
7.69%
6M
6.35%
1Y
21.75%
3Y*
20.56%
5Y*
11.52%
10Y*

VNQ

1D
-0.87%
1M
0.25%
YTD
10.80%
6M
10.46%
1Y
10.33%
3Y*
10.98%
5Y*
2.52%
10Y*
5.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESGV vs. VNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ESGV
Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF
7.69%16.48%24.69%30.79%-24.04%26.55%25.69%33.36%-14.45%
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
10.80%3.24%4.81%11.85%-26.25%40.54%-4.61%28.91%-6.73%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGV and VNQ is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2018

0.60

Over the past year, the correlation between ESGV and VNQ has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESGV vs. VNQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESGV
ESGV Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
ESGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGV Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGV Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

VNQ
VNQ Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
VNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
VNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGV vs. VNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ESGVVNQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.14

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

1.24

+0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.84

3.92

+3.91

ESGV vs. VNQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGV Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is higher than the VNQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGV and VNQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESGV vs. VNQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGV drawdown since its inception was -33.66%, smaller than the maximum VNQ drawdown of -73.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGV and VNQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESGVVNQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.66%

-73.07%

+39.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.60%

-8.34%

-3.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.41%

-17.46%

-2.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.81%

-34.48%

+5.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.61%

-1.52%

-2.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.40%

-13.60%

+7.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

2.66%

+0.12%

Volatility

ESGV vs. VNQ - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV) has a higher volatility of 5.59% compared to Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) at 5.27%. This indicates that ESGV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESGVVNQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.59%

5.27%

+0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.22%

10.24%

+0.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.12%

13.79%

+0.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.48%

18.87%

-0.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.59%

20.75%

-0.16%

ESGV vs. VNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than VNQ's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ESGV vs. VNQ - Dividend Comparison

ESGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than VNQ's 3.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESGV
Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF
0.89%0.91%1.04%1.16%1.42%0.95%1.11%1.27%0.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
3.59%3.92%3.85%3.95%3.91%2.56%3.93%3.39%4.74%4.23%4.82%3.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESGV and VNQ have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ESGV has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to VNQ (5.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGV dropped -33.66% vs VNQ's -73.07%.

On 5-year performance, ESGV leads with 11.52% vs 2.52% for VNQ. On fees, ESGV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VNQ has been the lower-risk option at 5.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ESGV has performed better with a 11.52% return vs 2.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ESGV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for VNQ.

VNQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 0.89% for ESGV.

ESGV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VNQ is REIT. ESGV tracks FTSE US All Cap Choice Index, while VNQ tracks MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ESGV and 0.13% for VNQ.

ESGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESGV and VNQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer