PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESGV vs. SUSL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESGV vs. SUSL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV) and iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF (SUSL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESGV achieves a 10.74% return, which is significantly higher than SUSL's 9.27% return.


ESGV

1D
-0.88%
1M
6.08%
YTD
10.74%
6M
10.73%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.27%
5Y*
12.64%
10Y*

SUSL

1D
-0.94%
1M
4.53%
YTD
9.27%
6M
10.06%
1Y
27.64%
3Y*
22.34%
5Y*
13.77%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESGV vs. SUSL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ESGV
Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF
10.74%16.48%24.69%30.79%-24.04%26.55%25.69%14.05%
SUSL
iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF
9.27%18.97%23.51%29.08%-20.22%31.53%18.89%16.29%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGV and SUSL is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2019

0.96

The correlation between ESGV and SUSL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

ESGV vs. SUSL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ESGV
SUSL

Technology

39.5%
36.9%

Communication Services

13.0%
14.5%

Financial Services

12.3%
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
8.6%

Healthcare

9.8%
9.6%

Industrials

4.5%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
4.2%

Real Estate

2.8%
2.2%

Basic Materials

1.9%
2.1%

Utilities

0.2%
1.1%

Energy

0.1%
2.1%

Technology

ESGV
39.5%
SUSL
36.9%

Communication Services

ESGV
13.0%
SUSL
14.5%

Financial Services

ESGV
12.3%
SUSL
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

ESGV
12.2%
SUSL
8.6%

Healthcare

ESGV
9.8%
SUSL
9.6%

Industrials

ESGV
4.5%
SUSL
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

ESGV
3.9%
SUSL
4.2%

Real Estate

ESGV
2.8%
SUSL
2.2%

Basic Materials

ESGV
1.9%
SUSL
2.1%

Utilities

ESGV
0.2%
SUSL
1.1%

Energy

ESGV
0.1%
SUSL
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESGV vs. SUSL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESGV
ESGV Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
ESGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGV Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGV Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

SUSL
SUSL Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SUSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUSL Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SUSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUSL Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGV vs. SUSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV) and iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF (SUSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESGVSUSLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.38

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

2.44

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.42

10.49

-0.08

ESGV vs. SUSL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGV Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the SUSL Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGV and SUSL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESGVSUSLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

2.14

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.79

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.85

-0.13

Drawdowns

ESGV vs. SUSL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGV drawdown since its inception was -33.66%, roughly equal to the maximum SUSL drawdown of -34.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGV and SUSL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESGVSUSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.66%

-34.26%

+0.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.60%

-11.37%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.41%

-19.91%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.81%

-26.98%

-1.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.88%

-1.38%

+0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.43%

-5.70%

-0.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

2.64%

+0.06%

Volatility

ESGV vs. SUSL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV) is 3.37%, while iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF (SUSL) has a volatility of 3.68%. This indicates that ESGV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SUSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESGVSUSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.37%

3.68%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.18%

9.98%

+0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.35%

12.98%

+0.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.35%

17.48%

+0.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.58%

19.80%

+0.78%

ESGV vs. SUSL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than SUSL's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ESGV vs. SUSL - Dividend Comparison

ESGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than SUSL's 0.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
ESGV
Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF
0.85%0.91%1.04%1.16%1.42%0.95%1.11%1.27%0.28%
SUSL
iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF
0.93%0.99%1.10%1.27%1.57%1.12%1.38%1.12%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, ESGV and SUSL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SUSL has higher volatility (3.68%) compared to ESGV (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGV dropped -33.66% vs SUSL's -34.26%.

On 5-year performance, SUSL leads with 13.77% vs 12.64% for ESGV. On fees, ESGV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, ESGV has been the lower-risk option at 3.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SUSL has performed better with a 13.77% return vs 12.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ESGV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for SUSL.

SUSL has the higher dividend yield at 0.93%, compared with 0.85% for ESGV.

ESGV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SUSL is Large Cap Growth Equities. ESGV tracks FTSE US All Cap Choice Index, while SUSL tracks MSCI USA Extended ESG Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ESGV and 0.10% for SUSL.

SUSL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESGV and SUSL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer