PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESGV vs. ITOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESGV vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ESGV having a 10.74% return and ITOT slightly higher at 11.25%.


ESGV

1D
-0.88%
1M
6.08%
YTD
10.74%
6M
10.73%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.27%
5Y*
12.64%
10Y*

ITOT

1D
-0.73%
1M
5.01%
YTD
11.25%
6M
11.12%
1Y
28.12%
3Y*
22.09%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*
15.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESGV vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ESGV
Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF
10.74%16.48%24.69%30.79%-24.04%26.55%25.69%33.36%-14.59%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
11.25%17.00%23.80%26.12%-19.47%25.68%20.71%30.67%-14.77%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGV and ITOT is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2018

0.99

The correlation between ESGV and ITOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

ESGV vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ESGV
ITOT

Technology

39.5%
33.8%

Communication Services

13.0%
10.3%

Financial Services

12.3%
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
10.1%

Healthcare

9.8%
9.0%

Industrials

4.5%
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
4.7%

Real Estate

2.8%
2.4%

Basic Materials

1.9%
2.1%

Utilities

0.2%
2.3%

Energy

0.1%
3.7%

Technology

ESGV
39.5%
ITOT
33.8%

Communication Services

ESGV
13.0%
ITOT
10.3%

Financial Services

ESGV
12.3%
ITOT
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

ESGV
12.2%
ITOT
10.1%

Healthcare

ESGV
9.8%
ITOT
9.0%

Industrials

ESGV
4.5%
ITOT
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

ESGV
3.9%
ITOT
4.7%

Real Estate

ESGV
2.8%
ITOT
2.4%

Basic Materials

ESGV
1.9%
ITOT
2.1%

Utilities

ESGV
0.2%
ITOT
2.3%

Energy

ESGV
0.1%
ITOT
3.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESGV vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESGV
ESGV Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
ESGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGV Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGV Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

ITOT
ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGV vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESGVITOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.42

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

3.17

-0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.42

14.57

-4.15

ESGV vs. ITOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGV Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the ITOT Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGV and ITOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESGVITOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

2.32

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.74

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.57

+0.15

Drawdowns

ESGV vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGV drawdown since its inception was -33.66%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGV and ITOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESGVITOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.66%

-55.20%

+21.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.60%

-8.90%

-2.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.41%

-19.44%

-0.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.81%

-25.36%

-3.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.88%

-0.73%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.43%

-6.97%

+0.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

1.94%

+0.76%

Volatility

ESGV vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV) has a higher volatility of 3.37% compared to iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) at 2.99%. This indicates that ESGV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESGVITOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.37%

2.99%

+0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.18%

9.13%

+1.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.35%

12.20%

+1.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.35%

17.36%

+0.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.58%

18.26%

+2.32%

ESGV vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ESGV vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison

ESGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than ITOT's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESGV
Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF
0.85%0.91%1.04%1.16%1.42%0.95%1.11%1.27%0.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
0.98%1.11%1.23%1.47%1.66%1.18%1.41%1.88%2.14%1.69%1.83%2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, ESGV and ITOT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ESGV has higher volatility (3.37%) compared to ITOT (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGV dropped -33.66% vs ITOT's -55.20%.

On 5-year performance, ITOT leads with 12.69% vs 12.64% for ESGV. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ITOT has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ITOT has performed better with a 12.69% return vs 12.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for ESGV.

ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.85% for ESGV.

ESGV tracks FTSE US All Cap Choice Index, while ITOT tracks S&P Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ESGV and 0.03% for ITOT.

ITOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESGV and ITOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer