ESGV vs. EEMV
ESGV (Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF) and EEMV (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESGV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the FTSE US All Cap Choice Index, while EEMV is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESGV returned 12.57%/yr vs 6.38%/yr for EEMV. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ESGV charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for EEMV.
Performance
ESGV vs. EEMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESGV achieves a 10.76% return, which is significantly lower than EEMV's 20.09% return.
ESGV
- 1D
- 2.01%
- 1M
- 2.85%
- YTD
- 10.76%
- 6M
- 11.56%
- 1Y
- 28.06%
- 3Y*
- 21.07%
- 5Y*
- 12.57%
- 10Y*
- —
EEMV
- 1D
- 2.55%
- 1M
- 7.71%
- YTD
- 20.09%
- 6M
- 21.21%
- 1Y
- 27.78%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- 7.04%
ESGV vs. EEMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGV Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF | 10.76% | 16.48% | 24.69% | 30.79% | -24.04% | 26.55% | 25.69% | 33.36% | -14.45% |
EEMV iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF | 20.09% | 13.45% | 7.98% | 7.75% | -13.94% | 5.05% | 6.90% | 7.83% | -3.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESGV and EEMV is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2018 | 0.65 |
The correlation between ESGV and EEMV shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (3 years) to 0.74 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ESGV vs. EEMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESGV
EEMV
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
Technology
ESGV
EEMV
Communication Services
ESGV
EEMV
Financial Services
ESGV
EEMV
Consumer Cyclical
ESGV
EEMV
Healthcare
ESGV
EEMV
Industrials
ESGV
EEMV
Consumer Defensive
ESGV
EEMV
Real Estate
ESGV
EEMV
Basic Materials
ESGV
EEMV
Utilities
ESGV
EEMV
Energy
ESGV
EEMV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESGV vs. EEMV — Risk / Return Rank
ESGV
EEMV
ESGV vs. EEMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESGV | EEMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.39 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.43 | 3.03 | -0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.21 | 10.90 | -0.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESGV vs. EEMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESGV drawdown since its inception was -33.66%, which is greater than EEMV's maximum drawdown of -31.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGV and EEMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESGV | EEMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.66% | -31.56% | -2.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.60% | -9.22% | -2.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.41% | -12.47% | -7.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.81% | -21.90% | -6.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.87% | 0.00% | -0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.41% | -7.96% | +1.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.75% | 2.56% | +0.19% |
Volatility
ESGV vs. EEMV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV) is 5.34%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) has a volatility of 8.16%. This indicates that ESGV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESGV | EEMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.34% | 8.16% | -2.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.13% | 13.51% | -2.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.99% | 14.67% | -0.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.45% | 12.22% | +6.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.60% | 13.99% | +6.61% |
ESGV vs. EEMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESGV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than EEMV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ESGV vs. EEMV - Dividend Comparison
ESGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than EEMV's 3.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMV iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF | 3.07% | 2.65% | 3.50% | 2.75% | 1.93% | 2.14% | 2.45% | 2.63% | 2.46% | 2.34% | 2.79% | 2.55% |
ESGV Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF | 0.85% | 0.91% | 1.04% | 1.16% | 1.42% | 0.95% | 1.11% | 1.27% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESGV and EEMV have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EEMV has higher volatility (8.16%) compared to ESGV (5.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGV dropped -33.66% vs EEMV's -31.56%.
On 5-year performance, ESGV leads with 12.57% vs 6.38% for EEMV. On fees, ESGV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, ESGV has been the lower-risk option at 5.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ESGV has performed better with a 12.57% return vs 6.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ESGV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for EEMV.
EEMV has the higher dividend yield at 3.07%, compared with 0.85% for ESGV.
ESGV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while EEMV is Asia Pacific Equities. ESGV tracks FTSE US All Cap Choice Index, while EEMV tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ESGV and 0.25% for EEMV.
ESGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESGV and EEMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer