PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESGV vs. EEMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESGV vs. EEMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESGV achieves a 10.76% return, which is significantly lower than EEMV's 20.09% return.


ESGV

1D
2.01%
1M
2.85%
YTD
10.76%
6M
11.56%
1Y
28.06%
3Y*
21.07%
5Y*
12.57%
10Y*

EEMV

1D
2.55%
1M
7.71%
YTD
20.09%
6M
21.21%
1Y
27.78%
3Y*
14.32%
5Y*
6.38%
10Y*
7.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESGV vs. EEMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ESGV
Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF
10.76%16.48%24.69%30.79%-24.04%26.55%25.69%33.36%-14.45%
EEMV
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF
20.09%13.45%7.98%7.75%-13.94%5.05%6.90%7.83%-3.36%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGV and EEMV is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2018

0.65

The correlation between ESGV and EEMV shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (3 years) to 0.74 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ESGV vs. EEMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ESGV
EEMV

Technology

39.5%
36.5%

Communication Services

13.0%
10.1%

Financial Services

12.3%
18.0%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
6.2%

Healthcare

9.8%
5.4%

Industrials

4.5%
6.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
5.6%

Real Estate

2.8%
0.6%

Basic Materials

1.9%
2.9%

Utilities

0.2%
4.4%

Energy

0.1%
3.6%

Technology

ESGV
39.5%
EEMV
36.5%

Communication Services

ESGV
13.0%
EEMV
10.1%

Financial Services

ESGV
12.3%
EEMV
18.0%

Consumer Cyclical

ESGV
12.2%
EEMV
6.2%

Healthcare

ESGV
9.8%
EEMV
5.4%

Industrials

ESGV
4.5%
EEMV
6.6%

Consumer Defensive

ESGV
3.9%
EEMV
5.6%

Real Estate

ESGV
2.8%
EEMV
0.6%

Basic Materials

ESGV
1.9%
EEMV
2.9%

Utilities

ESGV
0.2%
EEMV
4.4%

Energy

ESGV
0.1%
EEMV
3.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESGV vs. EEMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESGV
ESGV Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
ESGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGV Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGV Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

EEMV
EEMV Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
EEMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEMV Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
EEMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEMV Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGV vs. EEMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ESGVEEMVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.39

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

3.03

-0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.21

10.90

-0.68

ESGV vs. EEMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGV Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the EEMV Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGV and EEMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESGV vs. EEMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGV drawdown since its inception was -33.66%, which is greater than EEMV's maximum drawdown of -31.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGV and EEMV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESGVEEMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.66%

-31.56%

-2.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.60%

-9.22%

-2.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.41%

-12.47%

-7.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.81%

-21.90%

-6.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

0.00%

-0.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.41%

-7.96%

+1.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

2.56%

+0.19%

Volatility

ESGV vs. EEMV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV) is 5.34%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) has a volatility of 8.16%. This indicates that ESGV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESGVEEMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.34%

8.16%

-2.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.13%

13.51%

-2.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.99%

14.67%

-0.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.45%

12.22%

+6.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.60%

13.99%

+6.61%

ESGV vs. EEMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than EEMV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ESGV vs. EEMV - Dividend Comparison

ESGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than EEMV's 3.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEMV
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF
3.07%2.65%3.50%2.75%1.93%2.14%2.45%2.63%2.46%2.34%2.79%2.55%
ESGV
Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF
0.85%0.91%1.04%1.16%1.42%0.95%1.11%1.27%0.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESGV and EEMV have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EEMV has higher volatility (8.16%) compared to ESGV (5.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGV dropped -33.66% vs EEMV's -31.56%.

On 5-year performance, ESGV leads with 12.57% vs 6.38% for EEMV. On fees, ESGV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, ESGV has been the lower-risk option at 5.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ESGV has performed better with a 12.57% return vs 6.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ESGV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for EEMV.

EEMV has the higher dividend yield at 3.07%, compared with 0.85% for ESGV.

ESGV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while EEMV is Asia Pacific Equities. ESGV tracks FTSE US All Cap Choice Index, while EEMV tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ESGV and 0.25% for EEMV.

ESGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESGV and EEMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer