PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESGU vs. ACWI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESGU vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF (ESGU) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESGU achieves a 11.06% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI's 12.13% return.


ESGU

1D
-0.79%
1M
5.51%
YTD
11.06%
6M
10.93%
1Y
27.83%
3Y*
22.00%
5Y*
12.74%
10Y*

ACWI

1D
-0.83%
1M
5.28%
YTD
12.13%
6M
12.96%
1Y
29.18%
3Y*
21.15%
5Y*
11.28%
10Y*
12.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESGU vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ESGU
iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF
11.06%16.90%24.31%25.79%-20.27%26.89%22.54%31.72%-4.32%21.07%
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
12.13%22.41%17.45%22.27%-18.39%18.66%16.34%26.59%-9.19%24.33%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGU and ACWI is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2016

0.92

The correlation between ESGU and ACWI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

ESGU vs. ACWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ESGU
ACWI

Technology

38.7%
29.4%

Financial Services

11.5%
16.1%

Communication Services

9.8%
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
9.3%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.1%

Industrials

8.4%
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
5.0%

Energy

3.5%
4.2%

Utilities

2.4%
2.6%

Real Estate

2.1%
1.8%

Basic Materials

1.6%
3.7%

Technology

ESGU
38.7%
ACWI
29.4%

Financial Services

ESGU
11.5%
ACWI
16.1%

Communication Services

ESGU
9.8%
ACWI
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

ESGU
9.4%
ACWI
9.3%

Healthcare

ESGU
8.4%
ACWI
8.1%

Industrials

ESGU
8.4%
ACWI
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

ESGU
3.9%
ACWI
5.0%

Energy

ESGU
3.5%
ACWI
4.2%

Utilities

ESGU
2.4%
ACWI
2.6%

Real Estate

ESGU
2.1%
ACWI
1.8%

Basic Materials

ESGU
1.6%
ACWI
3.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESGU vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESGU
ESGU Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
ESGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGU Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGU Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

ACWI
ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGU vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF (ESGU) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESGUACWIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.41

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

3.01

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.75

13.53

+0.22

ESGU vs. ACWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGU Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the ACWI Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGU and ACWI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESGUACWIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

2.29

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.71

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.43

+0.41

Drawdowns

ESGU vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGU drawdown since its inception was -33.87%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGU and ACWI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESGUACWIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.87%

-56.00%

+22.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.26%

-9.73%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.32%

-16.55%

-2.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.15%

-26.42%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.79%

-0.83%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.89%

-8.61%

+3.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

2.16%

-0.13%

Volatility

ESGU vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF (ESGU) is 2.92%, while iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) has a volatility of 3.93%. This indicates that ESGU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESGUACWIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

3.93%

-1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.20%

10.29%

-1.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.16%

12.78%

-0.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.32%

16.05%

+1.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.60%

17.11%

+1.49%

ESGU vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGU has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESGU vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison

ESGU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than ACWI's 1.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
1.38%1.55%1.70%1.88%1.79%1.71%1.43%2.33%2.18%1.94%2.19%2.56%
ESGU
iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF
0.92%0.99%1.18%1.43%1.58%1.06%1.27%1.32%1.73%1.82%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, ESGU and ACWI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ACWI has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to ESGU (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGU dropped -33.87% vs ACWI's -56.00%.

On 5-year performance, ESGU leads with 12.74% vs 11.28% for ACWI. On fees, ESGU is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, ESGU has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ESGU has performed better with a 12.74% return vs 11.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ESGU is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWI.

ACWI has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 0.92% for ESGU.

ESGU is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while ACWI is Global Equities. ESGU tracks MSCI USA Extended ESG Focus Index, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ESGU and 0.32% for ACWI.

ESGU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESGU and ACWI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer