PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESGU.DE vs. LCUS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESGU.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI USA ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESGU.DE) and Lyxor Core US Equity (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ESGU.DE

1D
-0.51%
1M
5.84%
YTD
12.55%
6M
12.15%
1Y
25.15%
3Y*
18.92%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*

LCUS.DE

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESGU.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ESGU.DE
Invesco MSCI USA ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc
12.55%3.01%31.66%23.96%-17.68%39.98%12.25%13.25%
LCUS.DE
Lyxor Core US Equity (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
0.00%3.40%32.87%22.96%-15.87%37.82%9.09%11.67%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGU.DE and LCUS.DE is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2019

0.88

The correlation between ESGU.DE and LCUS.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (3 years) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESGU.DE vs. LCUS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESGU.DE
ESGU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
ESGU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

LCUS.DE
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGU.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI USA ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESGU.DE) and Lyxor Core US Equity (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESGU.DELCUS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.84

ESGU.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESGU.DELCUS.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

Drawdowns

ESGU.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESGU.DELCUS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.31%

Volatility

ESGU.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESGU.DELCUS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.47%

ESGU.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGU.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than LCUS.DE's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ESGU.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ESGU.DE nor LCUS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
ESGU.DE
Invesco MSCI USA ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LCUS.DE
Lyxor Core US Equity (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
0.00%0.00%0.84%0.78%2.27%1.12%1.52%1.10%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESGU.DE and LCUS.DE have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LCUS.DE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LCUS.DE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for ESGU.DE.

ESGU.DE tracks MSCI USA ESG Universal Select Business Screens, while LCUS.DE tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ESGU.DE and 0.04% for LCUS.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESGU.DE and LCUS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer