PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESGU.DE vs. 2B7K.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESGU.DE vs. 2B7K.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI USA ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESGU.DE) and iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (2B7K.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ESGU.DE having a 13.00% return and 2B7K.DE slightly higher at 13.28%.


ESGU.DE

1D
-0.66%
1M
1.71%
YTD
13.00%
6M
13.38%
1Y
25.98%
3Y*
19.27%
5Y*
13.15%
10Y*

2B7K.DE

1D
0.14%
1M
3.91%
YTD
13.28%
6M
13.46%
1Y
22.95%
3Y*
13.95%
5Y*
10.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESGU.DE vs. 2B7K.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ESGU.DE
Invesco MSCI USA ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc
13.00%3.01%31.66%23.96%-17.68%39.96%12.26%1.82%
2B7K.DE
iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
13.28%2.87%17.54%20.84%-16.92%36.73%9.54%14.70%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGU.DE and 2B7K.DE is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2019

0.93

The correlation between ESGU.DE and 2B7K.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESGU.DE vs. 2B7K.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESGU.DE
ESGU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
ESGU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

2B7K.DE
2B7K.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
2B7K.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2B7K.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
2B7K.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
2B7K.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
2B7K.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGU.DE vs. 2B7K.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI USA ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESGU.DE) and iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (2B7K.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ESGU.DE2B7K.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.33

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

2.99

+0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.11

11.15

-0.04

ESGU.DE vs. 2B7K.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGU.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the 2B7K.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGU.DE and 2B7K.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESGU.DE vs. 2B7K.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGU.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.64%, roughly equal to the maximum 2B7K.DE drawdown of -31.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGU.DE and 2B7K.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESGU.DE2B7K.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.64%

-31.63%

-1.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.05%

-7.66%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.69%

-21.33%

-2.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.69%

-21.33%

-2.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-0.50%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.68%

-5.10%

-0.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

2.05%

+0.28%

Volatility

ESGU.DE vs. 2B7K.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco MSCI USA ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESGU.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.64% compared to iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (2B7K.DE) at 3.38%. This indicates that ESGU.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 2B7K.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESGU.DE2B7K.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.64%

3.38%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.57%

9.53%

-0.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.31%

12.67%

-0.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.71%

14.66%

+1.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.92%

16.17%

+1.75%

ESGU.DE vs. 2B7K.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGU.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than 2B7K.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ESGU.DE vs. 2B7K.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ESGU.DE nor 2B7K.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ESGU.DE and 2B7K.DE have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ESGU.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESGU.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for 2B7K.DE.

ESGU.DE tracks MSCI USA ESG Universal Select Business Screens, while 2B7K.DE tracks MSCI World SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuels. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ESGU.DE and 0.20% for 2B7K.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESGU.DE and 2B7K.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer