PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESGM.DE vs. UEF5.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESGM.DE vs. UEF5.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESGM.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UEF5.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESGM.DE achieves a 29.14% return, which is significantly lower than UEF5.DE's 34.15% return.


ESGM.DE

1D
-1.89%
1M
5.25%
YTD
29.14%
6M
30.08%
1Y
49.72%
3Y*
20.28%
5Y*
10Y*

UEF5.DE

1D
-1.52%
1M
6.86%
YTD
34.15%
6M
35.47%
1Y
59.20%
3Y*
24.16%
5Y*
10.12%
10Y*
9.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESGM.DE vs. UEF5.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ESGM.DE
Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc
29.14%18.22%12.10%5.50%-14.87%-3.89%
UEF5.DE
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
34.15%21.04%15.43%3.76%-15.31%-3.25%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGM.DE and UEF5.DE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2021

0.93

The correlation between ESGM.DE and UEF5.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESGM.DE vs. UEF5.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESGM.DE
ESGM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
ESGM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

UEF5.DE
UEF5.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
UEF5.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UEF5.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
UEF5.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
UEF5.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
UEF5.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGM.DE vs. UEF5.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESGM.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UEF5.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESGM.DEUEF5.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.55

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.69

6.29

-1.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.49

21.83

-4.34

ESGM.DE vs. UEF5.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is comparable to the UEF5.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGM.DE and UEF5.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESGM.DEUEF5.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.75

3.14

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.41

+0.08

Drawdowns

ESGM.DE vs. UEF5.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGM.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.67%, smaller than the maximum UEF5.DE drawdown of -36.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGM.DE and UEF5.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESGM.DEUEF5.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.67%

-36.71%

+13.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.81%

-9.52%

-1.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.03%

-20.41%

+1.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.36%

-2.55%

+0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.34%

-9.99%

+0.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

2.75%

+0.15%

Volatility

ESGM.DE vs. UEF5.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESGM.DE) is 7.41%, while UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UEF5.DE) has a volatility of 8.72%. This indicates that ESGM.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UEF5.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESGM.DEUEF5.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.41%

8.72%

-1.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.79%

15.86%

-0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.41%

19.10%

-0.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.02%

17.66%

-0.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.02%

18.88%

-1.86%

ESGM.DE vs. UEF5.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGM.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than UEF5.DE's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ESGM.DE vs. UEF5.DE - Dividend Comparison

ESGM.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UEF5.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESGM.DE
Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UEF5.DE
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
1.58%2.19%1.73%2.36%2.19%1.32%1.89%2.00%2.16%2.00%2.30%1.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, ESGM.DE and UEF5.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, ESGM.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESGM.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for UEF5.DE.

ESGM.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Universal Select Business Screens, while UEF5.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ESGM.DE and 0.24% for UEF5.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESGM.DE and UEF5.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer