ESGL.L vs. MMS.L
ESGL.L (Lyxor MSCI Europe ESG Leaders (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc) and MMS.L (Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) are both Europe Equities funds from Amundi - ESGL.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR while MMS.L tracks the MSCI EMU Small Cap NR EUR. Both are passively managed. ESGL.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for MMS.L.
Performance
ESGL.L vs. MMS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ESGL.L
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 4.98%
- YTD
- 8.65%
- 6M
- 10.47%
- 1Y
- 19.77%
- 3Y*
- 11.78%
- 5Y*
- 8.78%
- 10Y*
- —
MMS.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESGL.L vs. MMS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ESGL.L Lyxor MSCI Europe ESG Leaders (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc | 8.65% | 19.00% | -0.37% |
MMS.L Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ESGL.L vs. MMS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESGL.L
MMS.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Energy
Financial Services
ESGL.L
MMS.L
Industrials
ESGL.L
MMS.L
Healthcare
ESGL.L
MMS.L
Technology
ESGL.L
MMS.L
Consumer Defensive
ESGL.L
MMS.L
Consumer Cyclical
ESGL.L
MMS.L
Utilities
ESGL.L
MMS.L
Communication Services
ESGL.L
MMS.L
Basic Materials
ESGL.L
MMS.L
Real Estate
ESGL.L
MMS.L
Energy
ESGL.L
MMS.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESGL.L vs. MMS.L — Risk / Return Rank
ESGL.L
MMS.L
ESGL.L vs. MMS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI Europe ESG Leaders (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (ESGL.L) and Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (MMS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESGL.L | MMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.71 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.22 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESGL.L | MMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | — | — |
Drawdowns
ESGL.L vs. MMS.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESGL.L | MMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.24% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.50% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.60% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.85% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.17% | — | — |
Volatility
ESGL.L vs. MMS.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESGL.L | MMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.47% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.05% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.12% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.61% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.54% | — | — |
ESGL.L vs. MMS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESGL.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than MMS.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESGL.L vs. MMS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ESGL.L nor MMS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, ESGL.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESGL.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for MMS.L.
ESGL.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while MMS.L tracks MSCI EMU Small Cap NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ESGL.L and 0.40% for MMS.L.
Find the right allocation for ESGL.L and MMS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer