ESGG.TO vs. HEQT.TO
ESGG.TO (BMO MSCI Global Selection Equity Index ETF) and HEQT.TO (Horizons All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, ESGG.TO returned 14.54%/yr vs 12.79%/yr for HEQT.TO. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
ESGG.TO vs. HEQT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESGG.TO achieves a 13.51% return, which is significantly lower than HEQT.TO's 15.56% return.
ESGG.TO
- 1D
- 1.89%
- 1M
- 3.45%
- YTD
- 13.51%
- 6M
- 12.68%
- 1Y
- 27.26%
- 3Y*
- 21.79%
- 5Y*
- 14.54%
- 10Y*
- —
HEQT.TO
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 2.49%
- YTD
- 15.56%
- 6M
- 15.07%
- 1Y
- 30.64%
- 3Y*
- 21.80%
- 5Y*
- 12.79%
- 10Y*
- —
ESGG.TO vs. HEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGG.TO BMO MSCI Global Selection Equity Index ETF | 13.51% | 15.44% | 27.08% | 23.34% | -14.25% | 23.71% | 8.86% |
HEQT.TO Horizons All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF | 15.56% | 19.82% | 23.83% | 22.29% | -18.95% | 22.54% | 13.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESGG.TO and HEQT.TO is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2020 | 0.55 |
The correlation between ESGG.TO and HEQT.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESGG.TO vs. HEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ESGG.TO
HEQT.TO
ESGG.TO vs. HEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO MSCI Global Selection Equity Index ETF (ESGG.TO) and Horizons All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF (HEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESGG.TO | HEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.46 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.95 | 3.63 | -0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.73 | 15.71 | -3.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESGG.TO vs. HEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESGG.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.90%, smaller than the maximum HEQT.TO drawdown of -31.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGG.TO and HEQT.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESGG.TO | HEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.90% | -31.82% | +3.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.27% | -8.49% | -0.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.79% | -15.33% | -2.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.31% | -24.89% | -0.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.37% | +0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.81% | -5.14% | -0.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.33% | 1.96% | +0.37% |
Volatility
ESGG.TO vs. HEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BMO MSCI Global Selection Equity Index ETF (ESGG.TO) is 3.91%, while Horizons All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF (HEQT.TO) has a volatility of 5.05%. This indicates that ESGG.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HEQT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESGG.TO | HEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.91% | 5.05% | -1.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.68% | 10.62% | -0.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.74% | 12.61% | -0.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.40% | 15.01% | -0.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.38% | 16.87% | -0.49% |
Dividends
ESGG.TO vs. HEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison
ESGG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than HEQT.TO's 1.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGG.TO BMO MSCI Global Selection Equity Index ETF | 0.86% | 1.01% | 1.20% | 1.56% | 1.82% | 1.53% | 1.87% | 0.00% |
HEQT.TO Horizons All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF | 1.46% | 1.70% | 1.67% | 0.84% | 0.03% | 0.02% | 1.40% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESGG.TO and HEQT.TO have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: BMO and Horizons.
Find the right allocation for ESGG.TO and HEQT.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer