PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HEQT.TO vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HEQT.TO vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Horizons All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF (HEQT.TO) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HEQT.TO is traded in CAD, while SCHG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SCHG values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HEQT.TO achieves a 13.56% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 7.77% return.


HEQT.TO

1D
-0.58%
1M
6.87%
YTD
13.56%
6M
13.18%
1Y
31.58%
3Y*
25.58%
5Y*
16.77%
10Y*

SCHG

1D
-0.82%
1M
6.90%
YTD
7.77%
6M
5.40%
1Y
26.25%
3Y*
26.47%
5Y*
18.90%
10Y*
19.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HEQT.TO vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HEQT.TO
Horizons All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF
13.56%19.82%25.95%31.63%-12.65%23.11%16.34%7.76%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
7.77%12.11%46.55%46.80%-26.94%26.96%36.79%6.39%

Correlation

The correlation between HEQT.TO and SCHG is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2019

0.69

The correlation between HEQT.TO and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HEQT.TO vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HEQT.TO
HEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
HEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
HEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HEQT.TO vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizons All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF (HEQT.TO) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HEQT.TOSCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.31

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.74

1.57

+2.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.49

4.54

+11.94

HEQT.TO vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HEQT.TO and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HEQT.TOSCHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.65

1.74

+0.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.10

0.92

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

1.05

0.00

Drawdowns

HEQT.TO vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HEQT.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.82%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHG drawdown of -32.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEQT.TO and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HEQT.TOSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.82%

-32.13%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.49%

-16.78%

+8.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.33%

-23.81%

+8.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.25%

-32.13%

+7.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-1.07%

+0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.29%

-4.73%

+0.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

5.79%

-3.87%

Volatility

HEQT.TO vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Horizons All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF (HEQT.TO) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) have volatilities of 3.53% and 3.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HEQT.TOSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.53%

3.49%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.67%

11.32%

-1.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.96%

15.21%

-3.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.33%

20.60%

-5.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.16%

19.99%

-2.83%

HEQT.TO vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

HEQT.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HEQT.TO vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

HEQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, more than SCHG's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HEQT.TO
Horizons All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF
1.61%1.70%3.22%7.85%7.31%0.48%1.40%0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.36%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


HEQT.TO and SCHG have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for HEQT.TO.

HEQT.TO is categorized as Global Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Horizons and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for HEQT.TO and 0.04% for SCHG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HEQT.TO and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer