HEQT.TO vs. SCHG
HEQT.TO (Horizons All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HEQT.TO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Horizons, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. HEQT.TO is actively managed, while SCHG is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HEQT.TO returned 16.77%/yr vs 18.90%/yr for SCHG. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HEQT.TO charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.
Performance
HEQT.TO vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HEQT.TO is traded in CAD, while SCHG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SCHG values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HEQT.TO achieves a 13.56% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 7.77% return.
HEQT.TO
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 6.87%
- YTD
- 13.56%
- 6M
- 13.18%
- 1Y
- 31.58%
- 3Y*
- 25.58%
- 5Y*
- 16.77%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHG
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- 6.90%
- YTD
- 7.77%
- 6M
- 5.40%
- 1Y
- 26.25%
- 3Y*
- 26.47%
- 5Y*
- 18.90%
- 10Y*
- 19.63%
HEQT.TO vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEQT.TO Horizons All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF | 13.56% | 19.82% | 25.95% | 31.63% | -12.65% | 23.11% | 16.34% | 7.76% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 7.77% | 12.11% | 46.55% | 46.80% | -26.94% | 26.96% | 36.79% | 6.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between HEQT.TO and SCHG is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2019 | 0.69 |
The correlation between HEQT.TO and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HEQT.TO vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
HEQT.TO
SCHG
HEQT.TO vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizons All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF (HEQT.TO) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HEQT.TO | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.31 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.74 | 1.57 | +2.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.49 | 4.54 | +11.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HEQT.TO | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.65 | 1.74 | +0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.10 | 0.92 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.05 | 1.05 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
HEQT.TO vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEQT.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.82%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHG drawdown of -32.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEQT.TO and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEQT.TO | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.82% | -32.13% | +0.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.49% | -16.78% | +8.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.33% | -23.81% | +8.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.25% | -32.13% | +7.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -1.07% | +0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.29% | -4.73% | +0.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 5.79% | -3.87% |
Volatility
HEQT.TO vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
Horizons All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF (HEQT.TO) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) have volatilities of 3.53% and 3.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HEQT.TO | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.53% | 3.49% | +0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.67% | 11.32% | -1.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.96% | 15.21% | -3.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.33% | 20.60% | -5.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.16% | 19.99% | -2.83% |
HEQT.TO vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
HEQT.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HEQT.TO vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
HEQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, more than SCHG's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEQT.TO Horizons All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF | 1.61% | 1.70% | 3.22% | 7.85% | 7.31% | 0.48% | 1.40% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.36% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HEQT.TO and SCHG have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for HEQT.TO.
HEQT.TO is categorized as Global Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Horizons and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for HEQT.TO and 0.04% for SCHG.
Find the right allocation for HEQT.TO and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer