ESGF.TO vs. XIGS.TO
ESGF.TO (BMO ESG US Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF) and XIGS.TO (iShares 1-5 Year U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) are both Corporate Bonds funds. Over the past 3 years, ESGF.TO returned 2.73%/yr vs 4.15%/yr for XIGS.TO. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ESGF.TO vs. XIGS.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESGF.TO achieves a -0.04% return, which is significantly lower than XIGS.TO's 0.04% return.
ESGF.TO
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- -0.04%
- 6M
- -0.33%
- 1Y
- 2.57%
- 3Y*
- 2.73%
- 5Y*
- -1.70%
- 10Y*
- —
XIGS.TO
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- YTD
- 0.04%
- 6M
- -0.07%
- 1Y
- 1.85%
- 3Y*
- 4.15%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESGF.TO vs. XIGS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGF.TO BMO ESG US Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF | -0.04% | 5.25% | -2.92% | 7.28% | -15.76% | -1.66% |
XIGS.TO iShares 1-5 Year U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 0.04% | 4.82% | 3.76% | 5.39% | -5.89% | -0.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESGF.TO and XIGS.TO is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2021 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESGF.TO vs. XIGS.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ESGF.TO
XIGS.TO
ESGF.TO vs. XIGS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO ESG US Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ESGF.TO) and iShares 1-5 Year U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XIGS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESGF.TO | XIGS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.16 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | 1.16 | -0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.00 | 3.25 | -1.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESGF.TO vs. XIGS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESGF.TO drawdown since its inception was -23.55%, which is greater than XIGS.TO's maximum drawdown of -10.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGF.TO and XIGS.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESGF.TO | XIGS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.55% | -10.12% | -13.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.92% | -1.60% | -1.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.77% | -1.60% | -7.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.18% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.58% | -0.68% | -9.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.59% | -2.89% | -7.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.29% | 0.57% | +0.72% |
Volatility
ESGF.TO vs. XIGS.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO ESG US Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ESGF.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.12% compared to iShares 1-5 Year U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XIGS.TO) at 0.60%. This indicates that ESGF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XIGS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESGF.TO | XIGS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.12% | 0.60% | +1.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.76% | 1.63% | +2.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.06% | 2.24% | +2.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.34% | 3.30% | +12.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.73% | 3.30% | +12.43% |
Dividends
ESGF.TO vs. XIGS.TO - Dividend Comparison
ESGF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%, less than XIGS.TO's 4.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGF.TO BMO ESG US Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF | 4.39% | 4.14% | 4.08% | 4.06% | 3.77% | 2.93% | 2.75% |
XIGS.TO iShares 1-5 Year U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 4.54% | 4.10% | 3.71% | 3.03% | 1.75% | 0.84% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESGF.TO and XIGS.TO have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: BMO and iShares.
Find the right allocation for ESGF.TO and XIGS.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer