ESGF.TO vs. RQP.TO
ESGF.TO (BMO ESG US Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF) and RQP.TO (RBC Target 2027 Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, ESGF.TO returned -1.73%/yr vs 1.75%/yr for RQP.TO. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ESGF.TO vs. RQP.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESGF.TO achieves a -0.85% return, which is significantly lower than RQP.TO's 1.35% return.
ESGF.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.68%
- 6M
- -1.38%
- YTD
- -0.85%
- 1Y
- 2.64%
- 3Y*
- 2.01%
- 5Y*
- -1.73%
- 10Y*
- —
RQP.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- 6M
- 1.13%
- YTD
- 1.35%
- 1Y
- 3.30%
- 3Y*
- 5.74%
- 5Y*
- 1.75%
- 10Y*
- —
ESGF.TO vs. RQP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGF.TO BMO ESG US Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF | -0.85% | 5.25% | -2.92% | 7.28% | -15.76% | -3.12% | 1.66% |
RQP.TO RBC Target 2027 Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF | 1.35% | 4.15% | 6.22% | 6.87% | -8.19% | -2.20% | 1.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESGF.TO and RQP.TO is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2020 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESGF.TO vs. RQP.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ESGF.TO
RQP.TO
ESGF.TO vs. RQP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO ESG US Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ESGF.TO) and RBC Target 2027 Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF (RQP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESGF.TO | RQP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.64 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.91 | 5.07 | -4.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.96 | 26.61 | -24.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESGF.TO vs. RQP.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESGF.TO drawdown since its inception was -23.55%, which is greater than RQP.TO's maximum drawdown of -13.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGF.TO and RQP.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESGF.TO | RQP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.55% | -13.88% | -9.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.92% | -0.65% | -2.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.77% | -1.46% | -7.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.18% | -12.93% | -10.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.30% | 0.00% | -11.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.59% | -4.13% | -6.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.35% | 0.12% | +1.23% |
Volatility
ESGF.TO vs. RQP.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO ESG US Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ESGF.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.12% compared to RBC Target 2027 Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF (RQP.TO) at 0.33%. This indicates that ESGF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RQP.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESGF.TO | RQP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.12% | 0.33% | +1.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.83% | 0.85% | +2.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.00% | 1.16% | +3.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.24% | 3.86% | +11.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.68% | 3.77% | +11.91% |
Dividends
ESGF.TO vs. RQP.TO - Dividend Comparison
ESGF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, more than RQP.TO's 3.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGF.TO BMO ESG US Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF | 4.42% | 4.14% | 4.08% | 4.06% | 3.77% | 2.93% | 2.75% |
RQP.TO RBC Target 2027 Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF | 3.70% | 3.58% | 3.25% | 3.18% | 2.67% | 2.29% | 0.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESGF.TO and RQP.TO have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: BMO and RBC.
Find the right allocation for ESGF.TO and RQP.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer