PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESGEX vs. AMRGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESGEX vs. AMRGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Reynders McVeigh Core Equity Fund (ESGEX) and American Growth Fund Series One (AMRGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESGEX achieves a 3.57% return, which is significantly lower than AMRGX's 20.12% return.


ESGEX

1D
1.49%
1M
2.54%
YTD
3.57%
6M
2.69%
1Y
14.50%
3Y*
13.71%
5Y*
6.80%
10Y*

AMRGX

1D
2.23%
1M
4.70%
YTD
20.12%
6M
18.73%
1Y
40.28%
3Y*
19.45%
5Y*
11.19%
10Y*
12.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESGEX vs. AMRGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ESGEX
Reynders McVeigh Core Equity Fund
3.57%18.30%14.03%18.49%-23.44%18.09%46.35%12.54%
AMRGX
American Growth Fund Series One
20.12%11.18%16.61%24.38%-19.93%15.64%18.65%18.51%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGEX and AMRGX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2019

0.84

The correlation between ESGEX and AMRGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESGEX vs. AMRGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESGEX
ESGEX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
ESGEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGEX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGEX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

AMRGX
AMRGX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
AMRGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMRGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMRGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
AMRGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMRGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGEX vs. AMRGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reynders McVeigh Core Equity Fund (ESGEX) and American Growth Fund Series One (AMRGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ESGEXAMRGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.38

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.04

2.95

-1.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.62

7.17

-3.55

ESGEX vs. AMRGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGEX Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the AMRGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGEX and AMRGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESGEX vs. AMRGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGEX drawdown since its inception was -31.73%, smaller than the maximum AMRGX drawdown of -80.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGEX and AMRGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESGEXAMRGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.73%

-80.32%

+48.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.58%

-13.98%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.40%

-21.15%

+2.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.73%

-35.42%

+3.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.40%

0.00%

-1.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.95%

-40.18%

+32.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.89%

5.70%

-1.81%

Volatility

ESGEX vs. AMRGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Reynders McVeigh Core Equity Fund (ESGEX) is 5.77%, while American Growth Fund Series One (AMRGX) has a volatility of 8.21%. This indicates that ESGEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMRGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESGEXAMRGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.77%

8.21%

-2.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.05%

15.95%

-3.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.97%

27.72%

-12.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.58%

22.42%

-4.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.30%

21.60%

-2.30%

ESGEX vs. AMRGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGEX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is lower than AMRGX's 4.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESGEX vs. AMRGX - Dividend Comparison

ESGEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%, less than AMRGX's 14.84% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
AMRGX
American Growth Fund Series One
14.84%17.82%12.39%8.17%7.77%12.21%2.36%0.00%
ESGEX
Reynders McVeigh Core Equity Fund
5.02%5.20%1.57%0.48%0.96%4.20%0.06%0.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESGEX and AMRGX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMRGX has higher volatility (8.21%) compared to ESGEX (5.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGEX dropped -31.73% vs AMRGX's -80.32%.

AMRGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESGEX and AMRGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer