PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESGE vs. LDEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESGE vs. LDEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF (ESGE) and iShares ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF (LDEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESGE achieves a 26.85% return, which is significantly higher than LDEM's 6.92% return.


ESGE

1D
-1.23%
1M
9.37%
YTD
26.85%
6M
29.21%
1Y
55.02%
3Y*
24.13%
5Y*
6.83%
10Y*

LDEM

1D
-1.61%
1M
0.72%
YTD
6.92%
6M
7.76%
1Y
25.33%
3Y*
15.06%
5Y*
1.89%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESGE vs. LDEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ESGE
iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF
26.85%35.86%6.63%9.51%-22.41%-2.87%18.20%
LDEM
iShares ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF
6.92%32.49%5.87%6.49%-22.46%-2.03%15.59%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGE and LDEM is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2020

0.92

The correlation between ESGE and LDEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

ESGE vs. LDEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ESGE
LDEM

Technology

43.4%
13.0%

Financial Services

20.9%
28.2%

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%
14.0%

Communication Services

7.2%
11.2%

Industrials

4.7%
8.0%

Basic Materials

4.1%
7.8%

Healthcare

2.4%
4.3%

Energy

2.2%
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

2.1%
3.6%

Utilities

1.5%
2.9%

Real Estate

1.1%
1.7%

Technology

ESGE
43.4%
LDEM
13.0%

Financial Services

ESGE
20.9%
LDEM
28.2%

Consumer Cyclical

ESGE
8.3%
LDEM
14.0%

Communication Services

ESGE
7.2%
LDEM
11.2%

Industrials

ESGE
4.7%
LDEM
8.0%

Basic Materials

ESGE
4.1%
LDEM
7.8%

Healthcare

ESGE
2.4%
LDEM
4.3%

Energy

ESGE
2.2%
LDEM
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

ESGE
2.1%
LDEM
3.6%

Utilities

ESGE
1.5%
LDEM
2.9%

Real Estate

ESGE
1.1%
LDEM
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESGE vs. LDEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESGE
ESGE Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
ESGE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGE Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGE Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

LDEM
LDEM Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
LDEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDEM Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
LDEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDEM Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGE vs. LDEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF (ESGE) and iShares ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF (LDEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESGELDEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.27

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.98

1.93

+2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.51

6.33

+9.18

ESGE vs. LDEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGE Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is higher than the LDEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGE and LDEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESGELDEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.75

1.44

+1.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.10

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.27

+0.23

Drawdowns

ESGE vs. LDEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGE drawdown since its inception was -41.07%, roughly equal to the maximum LDEM drawdown of -40.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGE and LDEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESGELDEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.07%

-40.82%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.90%

-13.21%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.71%

-15.12%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.23%

-39.17%

-0.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.23%

-3.92%

+2.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.47%

-17.36%

+2.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.56%

4.01%

-0.45%

Volatility

ESGE vs. LDEM - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF (ESGE) has a higher volatility of 8.56% compared to iShares ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF (LDEM) at 6.08%. This indicates that ESGE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESGELDEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.56%

6.08%

+2.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.46%

13.90%

+3.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.10%

17.68%

+2.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.11%

19.09%

+0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.94%

20.73%

-0.79%

ESGE vs. LDEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than LDEM's 0.16% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ESGE vs. LDEM - Dividend Comparison

ESGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, less than LDEM's 3.04% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ESGE
iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF
1.97%2.50%2.41%2.64%2.68%2.66%1.31%2.59%2.19%1.86%0.27%
LDEM
iShares ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF
3.04%3.26%2.64%3.20%4.93%1.82%1.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, ESGE and LDEM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ESGE has higher volatility (8.56%) compared to LDEM (6.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGE dropped -41.07% vs LDEM's -40.82%.

On 5-year performance, ESGE leads with 6.83% vs 1.89% for LDEM. On fees, LDEM is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, LDEM has been the lower-risk option at 6.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ESGE has performed better with a 6.83% return vs 1.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LDEM is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for ESGE.

LDEM has the higher dividend yield at 3.04%, compared with 1.97% for ESGE.

ESGE tracks MSCI EM Extended ESG Focus Index, while LDEM tracks MSCI EM Extended ESG Leaders 5% Issuer Capped Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for ESGE and 0.16% for LDEM.

ESGE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESGE and LDEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer