ESGE vs. EJUL
ESGE (iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF) and EJUL (Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July) are both exchange-traded funds - ESGE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM Extended ESG Focus Index, while EJUL is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESGE returned 6.83%/yr vs 3.01%/yr for EJUL. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ESGE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for EJUL.
Performance
ESGE vs. EJUL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESGE achieves a 26.85% return, which is significantly higher than EJUL's 4.63% return.
ESGE
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- 9.37%
- YTD
- 26.85%
- 6M
- 29.21%
- 1Y
- 55.02%
- 3Y*
- 24.13%
- 5Y*
- 6.83%
- 10Y*
- —
EJUL
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 4.63%
- 6M
- 6.20%
- 1Y
- 18.82%
- 3Y*
- 10.25%
- 5Y*
- 3.01%
- 10Y*
- —
ESGE vs. EJUL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGE iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF | 26.85% | 35.86% | 6.63% | 9.51% | -22.41% | -2.87% | 18.60% | 6.52% |
EJUL Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July | 4.63% | 20.20% | 4.38% | 3.50% | -10.92% | -2.43% | 1.06% | 3.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESGE and EJUL is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2019 | 0.88 |
The correlation between ESGE and EJUL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
ESGE vs. EJUL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESGE
EJUL
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
ESGE
EJUL
Financial Services
ESGE
EJUL
Consumer Cyclical
ESGE
EJUL
Communication Services
ESGE
EJUL
Industrials
ESGE
EJUL
Basic Materials
ESGE
EJUL
Healthcare
ESGE
EJUL
Energy
ESGE
EJUL
Consumer Defensive
ESGE
EJUL
Utilities
ESGE
EJUL
Real Estate
ESGE
EJUL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESGE vs. EJUL — Risk / Return Rank
ESGE
EJUL
ESGE vs. EJUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF (ESGE) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July (EJUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESGE | EJUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.56 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.98 | 4.96 | -0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.51 | 21.65 | -6.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESGE | EJUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.75 | 2.59 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.28 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.27 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
ESGE vs. EJUL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESGE drawdown since its inception was -41.07%, which is greater than EJUL's maximum drawdown of -21.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGE and EJUL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESGE | EJUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.07% | -21.61% | -19.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.90% | -3.81% | -10.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.71% | -8.36% | -8.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.23% | -21.61% | -17.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.23% | -0.23% | -1.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.47% | -6.61% | -7.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.56% | 0.87% | +2.69% |
Volatility
ESGE vs. EJUL - Volatility Comparison
iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF (ESGE) has a higher volatility of 8.56% compared to Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July (EJUL) at 0.83%. This indicates that ESGE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EJUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESGE | EJUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.56% | 0.83% | +7.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.46% | 4.73% | +12.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.10% | 7.30% | +12.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.11% | 10.66% | +8.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.94% | 11.45% | +8.49% |
ESGE vs. EJUL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESGE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EJUL's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESGE vs. EJUL - Dividend Comparison
ESGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, while EJUL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EJUL Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ESGE iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF | 1.97% | 2.50% | 2.41% | 2.64% | 2.68% | 2.66% | 1.31% | 2.59% | 2.19% | 1.86% | 0.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESGE and EJUL have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ESGE has higher volatility (8.56%) compared to EJUL (0.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGE dropped -41.07% vs EJUL's -21.61%.
On 5-year performance, ESGE leads with 6.83% vs 3.01% for EJUL. On fees, ESGE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, EJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ESGE has performed better with a 6.83% return vs 3.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ESGE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for EJUL.
ESGE has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 0.00% for EJUL.
ESGE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while EJUL is Defined Outcome. ESGE tracks MSCI EM Extended ESG Focus Index, while EJUL tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for ESGE and 0.89% for EJUL.
ESGE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESGE and EJUL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer