ESGE.TO vs. ZEB.TO
ESGE.TO (BMO MSCI EAFE Selection Equity Index ETF) and ZEB.TO (BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESGE.TO is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by BMO, while ZEB.TO is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index. Over the past 5 years, ESGE.TO returned 10.48%/yr vs 20.81%/yr for ZEB.TO. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ESGE.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESGE.TO achieves a 14.35% return, which is significantly lower than ZEB.TO's 32.05% return.
ESGE.TO
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 4.82%
- YTD
- 14.35%
- 6M
- 14.12%
- 1Y
- 24.26%
- 3Y*
- 16.82%
- 5Y*
- 10.48%
- 10Y*
- —
ZEB.TO
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 11.13%
- YTD
- 32.05%
- 6M
- 31.46%
- 1Y
- 71.16%
- 3Y*
- 36.64%
- 5Y*
- 20.81%
- 10Y*
- 17.32%
ESGE.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGE.TO BMO MSCI EAFE Selection Equity Index ETF | 14.35% | 19.50% | 10.61% | 15.06% | -11.25% | 11.14% | 4.41% |
ZEB.TO BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF | 32.05% | 43.43% | 24.58% | 10.87% | -10.38% | 39.38% | 1.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESGE.TO and ZEB.TO is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2020 | 0.47 |
The correlation between ESGE.TO and ZEB.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESGE.TO vs. ZEB.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ESGE.TO
ZEB.TO
ESGE.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO MSCI EAFE Selection Equity Index ETF (ESGE.TO) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESGE.TO | ZEB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 2.01 | -0.71 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | 8.48 | -6.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.38 | 36.45 | -28.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESGE.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESGE.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.77%, smaller than the maximum ZEB.TO drawdown of -39.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGE.TO and ZEB.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESGE.TO | ZEB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.77% | -39.69% | +11.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.17% | -8.44% | -2.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.68% | -14.80% | +0.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.79% | -25.97% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.30% | -5.63% | +0.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 1.96% | +0.94% |
Volatility
ESGE.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO MSCI EAFE Selection Equity Index ETF (ESGE.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.23% compared to BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO) at 3.10%. This indicates that ESGE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZEB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESGE.TO | ZEB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.23% | 3.10% | +1.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.49% | 11.14% | +1.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.50% | 12.88% | +1.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.84% | 13.55% | +0.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.29% | 16.87% | -0.58% |
Dividends
ESGE.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Dividend Comparison
ESGE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than ZEB.TO's 2.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGE.TO BMO MSCI EAFE Selection Equity Index ETF | 1.75% | 2.10% | 2.60% | 2.89% | 2.95% | 2.54% | 2.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZEB.TO BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF | 2.30% | 2.95% | 3.98% | 4.75% | 4.29% | 3.13% | 4.15% | 3.65% | 3.64% | 3.02% | 3.19% | 3.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESGE.TO and ZEB.TO have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ESGE.TO is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while ZEB.TO is Financials Equities.
Find the right allocation for ESGE.TO and ZEB.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer