ESGB vs. TOAK
ESGB (IQ MacKay ESG Core Plus Bond ETF) and TOAK (Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESGB is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by IndexIQ, while TOAK is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by Twin Oak. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.26, they often move in opposite directions. ESGB charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for TOAK.
Performance
ESGB vs. TOAK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ESGB
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TOAK
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.53%
- 1Y
- 3.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESGB vs. TOAK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ESGB IQ MacKay ESG Core Plus Bond ETF | -0.18% |
TOAK Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF | 0.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESGB and TOAK is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2026 | -0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESGB vs. TOAK — Risk / Return Rank
ESGB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TOAK
ESGB vs. TOAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ MacKay ESG Core Plus Bond ETF (ESGB) and Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF (TOAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESGB | TOAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.77 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.04 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.19 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESGB vs. TOAK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESGB drawdown since its inception was -0.64%, smaller than the maximum TOAK drawdown of -1.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGB and TOAK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESGB | TOAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.64% | -1.81% | +1.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | -1.50% | +1.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.38% | -0.15% | -0.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.59% | — |
Volatility
ESGB vs. TOAK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESGB | TOAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.12% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.73% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.10% | 2.91% | +1.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.10% | 2.18% | +1.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.10% | 2.18% | +1.92% |
ESGB vs. TOAK - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESGB has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than TOAK's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESGB vs. TOAK - Dividend Comparison
Neither ESGB nor TOAK has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ESGB and TOAK have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TOAK is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TOAK is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ESGB.
ESGB and TOAK have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
ESGB is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while TOAK is Multistrategy. They also come from different issuers: IndexIQ and Twin Oak. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ESGB and 0.25% for TOAK.
Find the right allocation for ESGB and TOAK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer