ESGB vs. NCPB
ESGB (IQ MacKay ESG Core Plus Bond ETF) and NCPB (Nuveen Core Plus Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ESGB returned 5.08% vs 5.71% for NCPB. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ESGB charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for NCPB.
Performance
ESGB vs. NCPB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESGB achieves a 0.74% return, which is significantly higher than NCPB's 0.59% return.
ESGB
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 0.74%
- 6M
- 0.94%
- 1Y
- 5.08%
- 3Y*
- 5.59%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NCPB
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 0.59%
- 6M
- 0.84%
- 1Y
- 5.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESGB vs. NCPB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ESGB IQ MacKay ESG Core Plus Bond ETF | 0.74% | 7.76% | 4.00% |
NCPB Nuveen Core Plus Bond ETF | 0.59% | 7.69% | 3.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESGB and NCPB is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024 | 0.86 |
The correlation between ESGB and NCPB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESGB vs. NCPB — Risk / Return Rank
ESGB
NCPB
ESGB vs. NCPB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ MacKay ESG Core Plus Bond ETF (ESGB) and Nuveen Core Plus Bond ETF (NCPB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESGB | NCPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.30 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.96 | 1.99 | -0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.97 | 6.30 | -0.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESGB | NCPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | 1.64 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 1.22 | -1.05 |
Drawdowns
ESGB vs. NCPB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESGB drawdown since its inception was -18.96%, which is greater than NCPB's maximum drawdown of -3.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGB and NCPB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESGB | NCPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.96% | -3.59% | -15.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.60% | -2.88% | +0.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.20% | -1.25% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.07% | -0.93% | -6.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.85% | 0.91% | -0.06% |
Volatility
ESGB vs. NCPB - Volatility Comparison
IQ MacKay ESG Core Plus Bond ETF (ESGB) and Nuveen Core Plus Bond ETF (NCPB) have volatilities of 1.26% and 1.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESGB | NCPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.26% | 1.24% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.75% | 2.63% | +0.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.74% | 3.54% | +0.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.04% | 4.34% | +0.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.04% | 4.34% | +0.70% |
ESGB vs. NCPB - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESGB has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than NCPB's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESGB vs. NCPB - Dividend Comparison
ESGB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.49%, more than NCPB's 5.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGB IQ MacKay ESG Core Plus Bond ETF | 5.49% | 5.46% | 5.40% | 4.82% | 3.17% | 0.95% |
NCPB Nuveen Core Plus Bond ETF | 5.21% | 5.21% | 5.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESGB and NCPB have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ESGB has higher volatility (1.26%) compared to NCPB (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGB dropped -18.96% vs NCPB's -3.59%.
On 1-year performance, NCPB leads with 5.71% vs 5.08% for ESGB. On fees, NCPB is cheaper at 0.30% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NCPB has performed better with a 5.71% return vs 5.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NCPB is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ESGB.
ESGB has the higher dividend yield at 5.49%, compared with 5.21% for NCPB.
They also come from different issuers: IndexIQ and Nuveen. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ESGB and 0.30% for NCPB.
NCPB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESGB and NCPB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer