PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESG vs. SBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESG vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund (ESG) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESG achieves a 12.76% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 35.42% return.


ESG

1D
0.76%
1M
1.35%
6M
10.02%
YTD
12.76%
1Y
23.21%
3Y*
18.88%
5Y*
11.83%
10Y*
14.93%
ALL TIME*
14.94%

SBIT

1D
-2.88%
1M
-8.74%
6M
12.84%
YTD
35.42%
1Y
93.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-43.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$131.34K$103.15K$155.53K
$30.10M$32.07M$46.36M

ESG vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ESG
FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund
12.76%16.04%10.30%
SBIT
Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF
35.42%-25.11%-73.74%

Correlation

The correlation between ESG and SBIT is -0.44, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024

-0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESG vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ESG
ESG Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
ESG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESG Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
ESG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESG Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

SBIT
SBIT Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
SBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ESG vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund (ESG) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ESGSBITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.21

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.69

1.95

+0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.13

4.30

+6.82

ESG vs. SBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESG Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the SBIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESG and SBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESG vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESG drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESG and SBIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESGSBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.53%

-91.35%

+58.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.68%

-47.94%

+39.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-78.51%

+78.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.01%

-69.09%

+64.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

21.71%

-19.62%

Volatility

ESG vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund (ESG) is 3.37%, while Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a volatility of 17.65%. This indicates that ESG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESGSBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.37%

17.65%

-14.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.37%

67.17%

-57.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.75%

88.67%

-76.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.79%

96.04%

-79.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.34%

96.04%

-77.70%

ESG vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESG has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than SBIT's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESG vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison

ESG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than SBIT's 5.09% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ESG
FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund
0.86%0.96%1.18%1.10%1.38%1.03%1.33%1.51%1.72%1.52%0.92%
SBIT
Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF
5.09%0.52%1.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESG and SBIT have a correlation of -0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SBIT has higher volatility (17.65%) compared to ESG (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESG dropped -32.53% vs SBIT's -91.35%.

On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 93.05% vs 23.21% for ESG. On fees, ESG is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, ESG has been the lower-risk option at 3.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 93.05% return vs 23.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ESG is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SBIT.

SBIT has the higher dividend yield at 5.09%, compared with 0.86% for ESG.

ESG is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SBIT is Cryptocurrency. ESG tracks STOXX USA ESG Select KPIs Index, while SBIT tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for ESG and 0.95% for SBIT.

ESG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESG and SBIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer