PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESG.TO vs. HXS.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESG.TO vs. HXS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 ESG Index ETF (ESG.TO) and Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESG.TO achieves a 10.72% return, which is significantly lower than HXS.TO's 11.99% return.


ESG.TO

1D
-0.18%
1M
6.87%
YTD
10.72%
6M
7.79%
1Y
29.42%
3Y*
21.78%
5Y*
16.77%
10Y*

HXS.TO

1D
-0.27%
1M
7.20%
YTD
11.99%
6M
10.17%
1Y
29.00%
3Y*
23.29%
5Y*
16.64%
10Y*
15.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESG.TO vs. HXS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ESG.TO
Invesco S&P 500 ESG Index ETF
10.72%10.99%33.33%25.19%-14.05%32.71%19.30%
HXS.TO
Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF
11.99%11.93%34.98%23.22%-12.72%27.30%18.89%

Correlation

The correlation between ESG.TO and HXS.TO is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2020

0.81

The correlation between ESG.TO and HXS.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

ESG.TO vs. HXS.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ESG.TO
HXS.TO

Technology

38.6%
35.6%

Communication Services

14.5%
11.2%

Financial Services

12.0%
11.8%

Healthcare

9.3%
8.5%

Industrials

6.8%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

4.6%
10.1%

Energy

4.2%
3.5%

Real Estate

2.2%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.9%
1.8%

Utilities

0.8%
2.4%

Technology

ESG.TO
38.6%
HXS.TO
35.6%

Communication Services

ESG.TO
14.5%
HXS.TO
11.2%

Financial Services

ESG.TO
12.0%
HXS.TO
11.8%

Healthcare

ESG.TO
9.3%
HXS.TO
8.5%

Industrials

ESG.TO
6.8%
HXS.TO
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

ESG.TO
5.1%
HXS.TO
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

ESG.TO
4.6%
HXS.TO
10.1%

Energy

ESG.TO
4.2%
HXS.TO
3.5%

Real Estate

ESG.TO
2.2%
HXS.TO
1.9%

Basic Materials

ESG.TO
1.9%
HXS.TO
1.8%

Utilities

ESG.TO
0.8%
HXS.TO
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESG.TO vs. HXS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESG.TO
ESG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
ESG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
ESG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

HXS.TO
HXS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
HXS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HXS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
HXS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
HXS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
HXS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESG.TO vs. HXS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 ESG Index ETF (ESG.TO) and Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESG.TOHXS.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.45

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.05

3.33

-0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.22

12.62

-1.41

ESG.TO vs. HXS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESG.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the HXS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESG.TO and HXS.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESG.TOHXS.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

2.46

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.13

1.11

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.10

1.02

+0.08

Drawdowns

ESG.TO vs. HXS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESG.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.31%, smaller than the maximum HXS.TO drawdown of -27.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESG.TO and HXS.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESG.TOHXS.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.31%

-27.42%

+5.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.69%

-8.74%

-0.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.85%

-18.98%

-0.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.31%

-22.63%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

-0.27%

-0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.30%

-3.54%

-0.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

2.30%

+0.33%

Volatility

ESG.TO vs. HXS.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 ESG Index ETF (ESG.TO) is 3.00%, while Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXS.TO) has a volatility of 3.27%. This indicates that ESG.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HXS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESG.TOHXS.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.00%

3.27%

-0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.36%

8.83%

+0.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.04%

11.85%

+0.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.98%

15.13%

-0.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.34%

16.53%

-0.19%

ESG.TO vs. HXS.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESG.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than HXS.TO's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ESG.TO vs. HXS.TO - Dividend Comparison

ESG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, while HXS.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
ESG.TO
Invesco S&P 500 ESG Index ETF
0.76%0.85%0.92%1.11%1.38%1.11%0.95%
HXS.TO
Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESG.TO and HXS.TO have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HXS.TO is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HXS.TO is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ESG.TO.

ESG.TO tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight ESG Leaders Select Index, while HXS.TO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ESG.TO and 0.10% for HXS.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESG.TO and HXS.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer