ESG.TO vs. HXS.TO
ESG.TO (Invesco S&P 500 ESG Index ETF) and HXS.TO (Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF) are both S&P 500 funds - ESG.TO tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight ESG Leaders Select Index while HXS.TO tracks the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESG.TO returned 16.77%/yr vs 16.64%/yr for HXS.TO. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ESG.TO charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for HXS.TO.
Performance
ESG.TO vs. HXS.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESG.TO achieves a 10.72% return, which is significantly lower than HXS.TO's 11.99% return.
ESG.TO
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 6.87%
- YTD
- 10.72%
- 6M
- 7.79%
- 1Y
- 29.42%
- 3Y*
- 21.78%
- 5Y*
- 16.77%
- 10Y*
- —
HXS.TO
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 7.20%
- YTD
- 11.99%
- 6M
- 10.17%
- 1Y
- 29.00%
- 3Y*
- 23.29%
- 5Y*
- 16.64%
- 10Y*
- 15.90%
ESG.TO vs. HXS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESG.TO Invesco S&P 500 ESG Index ETF | 10.72% | 10.99% | 33.33% | 25.19% | -14.05% | 32.71% | 19.30% |
HXS.TO Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF | 11.99% | 11.93% | 34.98% | 23.22% | -12.72% | 27.30% | 18.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESG.TO and HXS.TO is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2020 | 0.81 |
The correlation between ESG.TO and HXS.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
ESG.TO vs. HXS.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESG.TO
HXS.TO
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
ESG.TO
HXS.TO
Communication Services
ESG.TO
HXS.TO
Financial Services
ESG.TO
HXS.TO
Healthcare
ESG.TO
HXS.TO
Industrials
ESG.TO
HXS.TO
Consumer Defensive
ESG.TO
HXS.TO
Consumer Cyclical
ESG.TO
HXS.TO
Energy
ESG.TO
HXS.TO
Real Estate
ESG.TO
HXS.TO
Basic Materials
ESG.TO
HXS.TO
Utilities
ESG.TO
HXS.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESG.TO vs. HXS.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ESG.TO
HXS.TO
ESG.TO vs. HXS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 ESG Index ETF (ESG.TO) and Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESG.TO | HXS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.45 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.05 | 3.33 | -0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.22 | 12.62 | -1.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESG.TO | HXS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.46 | 2.46 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.13 | 1.11 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.97 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.10 | 1.02 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
ESG.TO vs. HXS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESG.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.31%, smaller than the maximum HXS.TO drawdown of -27.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESG.TO and HXS.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESG.TO | HXS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.31% | -27.42% | +5.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.69% | -8.74% | -0.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.85% | -18.98% | -0.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.31% | -22.63% | +0.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.63% | -0.27% | -0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.30% | -3.54% | -0.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.63% | 2.30% | +0.33% |
Volatility
ESG.TO vs. HXS.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 ESG Index ETF (ESG.TO) is 3.00%, while Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXS.TO) has a volatility of 3.27%. This indicates that ESG.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HXS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESG.TO | HXS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.00% | 3.27% | -0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.36% | 8.83% | +0.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.04% | 11.85% | +0.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.98% | 15.13% | -0.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.34% | 16.53% | -0.19% |
ESG.TO vs. HXS.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESG.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than HXS.TO's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ESG.TO vs. HXS.TO - Dividend Comparison
ESG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, while HXS.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESG.TO Invesco S&P 500 ESG Index ETF | 0.76% | 0.85% | 0.92% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 1.11% | 0.95% |
HXS.TO Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESG.TO and HXS.TO have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HXS.TO is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HXS.TO is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ESG.TO.
ESG.TO tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight ESG Leaders Select Index, while HXS.TO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ESG.TO and 0.10% for HXS.TO.
Find the right allocation for ESG.TO and HXS.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer